FORD MOTOR COMPANY | Report on supply chain sustainability at Ford Motor Company

Status
Filed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
7
Resolution details
Company ticker
F
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • GHG targets / emissions
  • Land use inc. deforestation
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Resolved: Proponents request that Ford issue a report on its aluminum, steel, mineral, rubber, and leather supply chains, disclosing how it can enhance supply chain traceability and transparency regarding deforestation risk and GHG emissions and increase procurement targets for sustainable materials.
Whereas clause
Whereas: Vehicle manufacturing relies on extraction, processing, and manufacturing of aluminum, steel, minerals, rubber and leather — activities associated with intensive environmental degradation1, 2 and substantial greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions:

The aluminum and steel sectors account for approximately 9% of global GHG emissions.3, 4 In 2019, vehicle manufacturers consumed 18% of aluminum5 and 12% of steel6 globally.
Clearing forests for cattle raising is a leading cause of deforestation in Brazil, a country considered a major source of leather for U.S. auto manufacturers.7
Unsustainable practices used to expand rubber tree cultivation in Southeast Asia and in Africa threaten the destruction of biodiverse ecosystems.8
Strip mining minerals and ores for automotive parts is associated with the destruction of high carbon stock forests, valuable for their ability to store carbon and provide richly diverse habitats.9, 10
​Ford is working on important sustainability initiatives. However Ford’s current goals and disclosures are not comprehensive.

Although Ford was a founding member of the Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber (GPSNR), the Company subsequently dropped its membership. Ford also doesn’t disclose information on deforestation risk or biodiversity loss associated with rubber used in its vehicles, nor does it provide insight into environmental risks associated with strip mining for minerals and ores or raising cattle for leather.

Ford has committed that 10% of its total primary steel and aluminum will be low carbon by 2030. But competitors have done more. Volvo and Mercedes-Benz have taken steps to improve steel supply chain sustainability by participating in the ResponsibleSteel™ initiative. Volvo has signed on to SteelZero, pledging to procure 50% net-zero steel by 2030 and 100% by 2050. Similarly, Audi, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz, participate in the Aluminum Stewardship Initiative, which promotes sustainable aluminum mining and production. Mercedes-Benz11 and Porsche12 have committed to reach near-zero carbon aluminum by the end of 2030.

Ford could address investor concerns and take meaningful action by providing more in-depth disclosures and ambitious target setting.
Supporting statement
Supporting Statement:

Shareholders recommend that the report be prepared at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, and, at board and management discretion, consider:

Disaggregating sourcing information for Ford’s full supply chains, e.g., mines, processors, smelters, refineries, manufacturers, farms and tanneries.
Enhancing disclosure on mineral/ore, rubber, and leather suppliers, deforestation risk associated with these materials, and risk mitigation measures.
​Addressing the pros and cons of rejoining GPSNR and participating in global value chain emissions reduction initiatives such as ResponsibleSteel, SteelZero, and the Aluminum Stewardship Initiative.



[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/17/climate/leather-seats-cars-rainforest.html.

[2] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06642-z​

[3] https://www.iea.org/reports/iron-and-steel-technology-roadmap

​[4] https://www.csis.org/analysis/decarbonizing-aluminum-rolling-out-more-sustainable-

sector#:~:text=Globally%2C%20the%20aluminum%20sector%20contributes,carbon%20dioxide%20(CO2)..

​[5] https://www.inclusivedevelopment.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/global_bauxite0721_web.pdf, 11.

[​6] https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-end-use-steel-demand-and-in-use-steel-stock-by-scenario-2000-2050.

​[7] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/17/climate/leather-seats-cars-rainforest.html.

​[8] https://www.sciencedirect.com/scisnce/article/pii/S096098222031006X​

[9] https://www.mightyearth.org/electric-vehicles-evs-are-vital-to-the-transition-away-from-fossil-

fuels-toward-clean-transportation-they-reduce-air-pollution-and-are-more-efficient-than-cars-that-run-on-gasoline-even-better-th//

​[10]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2023/ev-battery-bauxite-guinea/

​[11] https://europe.autonews.com/suppliers/mercedes-get-low-carbon-aluminum

​[12] https://www.greencarcongress.com/2023/04/20230428-porsche.html

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
LocalTapiola Asset Management Ltd For A vote FOR this proposal is warranted as the additional information would allow shareholders to determine
how the company is managing and mitigating the related risks

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.