AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY | Paris-Aligned Lobbying—Net Zero Assessment at American Express Company

Status
24.43% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
6
Resolution details
Company ticker
AXP
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Board of Directors annually analyze and report to shareholders (at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information) on whether and how American Express (“Amex” of “Company”) is aligning its lobbying and policy influence activities and positions, both direct and indirect (through trade associations, coalitions, and other organizations) with its net-zero emissions by 2035 target, including the activities and positions analyzed, the criteria used to assess alignment, and involvement of stakeholders, if any, in the analytical process.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: In evaluating the degree of alignment between the Company’s emissions goals and its lobbying, Amex should consider the policy positions, actual lobbying, and policy influence activities of organizations of which it is a member.
This request is consistent with the investor expectations described in the Global Standard on Responsible Climate Lobbying,1 which is a useful resource for implementation.
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change asserts that greenhouse gas emissions must decline by 45 percent from 2010 levels by 2030 to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. If that goal is not met, even more rapid reductions, at greater cost, will be required to compensate for the slow start.2
Amex has publicly committed to achieving company-wide net-zero emissions by 2035 in alignment with the Science Based Targets initiative.3 Amex has recognized that active engagement in the public policy arena is an essential part of responsible corporate citizenship. In its 2023 ESG Report, climate change was identified as the most important issue to Amex stakeholders.4 However, the Company’s positions and details of engagement over specific climate-related policies that would align with its own net-zero commitments are unclear.
Shareholders would thus benefit if Amex disclosed details on aligning its policy advocacy activities with its climate-related commitments.
Despite the recent passage of the Inflation Reduction Act, critical gaps remain between the United States’ Nationally Determined Contributions and necessary climate action.
Companies continue to have an important role to play in enabling policymakers to close these gaps.
Corporate lobbying that is inconsistent with the Paris Agreement presents increasingly material risks to Amex and its shareholders, as delays in emissions reductions undermine political stability, damage infrastructure, impair access to finance and insurance, and exacerbate health risks.
While Amex has disclosed memberships in trade associations, investors lack sufficient information to understand how the company ensures its direct and indirect lobbying aligns with its climate-related commitments, and what actions it takes to address any misalignments. This is concerning given the company’s membership in major trade associations with track records of opposing science-based climate policies, such as the Business Roundtable5 and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.6
Add Value: Vote For Proposal [4*]
Report Climate Lobbying Alignment
1 https://climate-lobbying.com/
2 https://unfccc.int/news/updated-ndc-synthesis-report-worrying-trends-confirmed 
3 https://www.ibm.com/about/environment/energy-climate 
4 https://www.americanexpress.com/content/dam/amex/en-us/newsroom/pdfs/AXP_2022- 2023_ESG_Report.pdf
5 https://lobbymap.org/influencer/Business-Roundtable
6 https://lobbymap.org/influencer/US-Chamber-of-Commerce/projectlink/US-Chamber-of-Commerce-In- Climate-Change

Filed by Myra K. Young.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.