Southwest Airlines | Improve the right to remove unqualified directors at Southwest Airlines

Status
7.91% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
6
Resolution details
Company ticker
LUV
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Shareholder rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Industrials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders ask our Board of Directors to take the steps necessary to permit removal of directors by a majority vote of shareholders with or without cause.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: This proposal topic won more than 53% shareholder support at the 2023 Southwest Airlines annual meeting. This 53% support followed 47% support at the both the 2021 and 2022 Southwest Airlines annual meeting in spite of formidable management resistance. The Southwest Board went ballistic and published a statement of resistance that had 6-times as many words as the 2021 proposal itself.

Plus there is no evidence that Southwest Airlines management subsequently talked to the large shareholders who voted in favor of the 2021, 2022 and 2023 proposals to determine the action they expected the Southwest Airlines Board to take.

The 2021 Board resistance to this proposal topic stuck up for a practice that could allow 350 days to elapse between the time a director was arrested to the date the director could be removed.

While the Board insisted that it should remain difficult to remove Southwest directors, there were signs that Southwest directors should take their jobs more seriously. These 3 Southwest directors each received more 29 million against votes in 2022:

David Biegler, chair of the executive pay committee

Veronica Biggins, chair of the nominating committee

William Cunningham, age 79

These 4 Southwest directors each received between 40 million and 80 million against votes in 2023:

David Biegler, age 77, chair of the executive pay committee

Veronica Biggins, age 77, 80 million against votes, chair of the nominating committee

William Cunningham, age 80

John Montford, age 80, chair of the audit committee

This is the first opportunity for a shareholder proposal to be filed following the December 2022 Southwest Airlines scheduling crisis. This Southwest Airlines scheduling crisis suggests that the Board does not exercise proper oversight. Southwest Airlines extensively canceled flights including more than 60% of its flights on two days. Previously in June and October 2021 Southwest suffered flight mass cancellations—a dismissed heads-up event.

By December 27, 2022 it became more clear that weather was not the sole cause of the mass cancellations; rather, the airline’s operational systems were struggling to recover from the disruptions. Antiquated computer infrastructure and software systems used for managing and crewing flights contributed heavily to the quantity of flight cancellations.

The antiquated computer infrastructure was combined with the number of full-time tech workers at Southwest declining by 27% from 2018 to 2021. The airline’s hesitance to adopt new technology had almost become a running joke around the company.

By January 6, 2023 Southwest stock had lost 8% of its value from immediately before the crisis. Southwest expected losses for the 4th quarter of 2022 of $725 million to $825 million.

Proposal ubmitted by John Chevedden.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.