GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY | Report on use of child labor in connection with the Company's EV supply chain at GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY

Status
12.79% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
4
Resolution details
Company ticker
GM
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Decent work
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that, beginning in 2025, General Motors Company (“GM”) report annually to shareholders on the extent to which its electric vehicle (“EV”) supply chain may involve, rely, or depend on child labor outside the United States. The report should be done at reasonable cost and omit proprietary and/or confidential business information.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: Numerous reports have shown that the mining of cobalt, a key component in EV batteries, is heavily dependent on child labor. Findings include:




About 70% of the global cobalt supply comes from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).1




Cobalt mining in the DRC is often done by children – as many as 40,000 – working in hazardous conditions that pose a serious risk of injury or death.2




Membership in industry initiatives and other civil society organizations does not demonstrate that a company’s cobalt supply chain is free of child labor, since these organizations have limited governmental involvement and lack authority to effectively regulate cobalt production.3




As of 2020, the large majority of cobalt-producing mines in Congo were owned or financed by Chinese companies,4 and the DRC government has made “minimal advancement” in efforts to eliminate child labor.5




As much as 70% of cobalt from the DRC is connected with child labor.6 And virtually all Cobalt from the DRC is tainted by various degrees of abuse including slavery, child labor, forced labor, human trafficking, hazardous and toxic working conditions, meager wages, and incalculable environmental harm.7




Monitoring the situation is difficult due to “aggressive security forces, intense surveillance, the remoteness of many mining areas, distrust of outsiders, and the sheer scale of hundreds of thousands of people engaged in the feverish excavation of cobalt in medieval conditions”.8




The use of child labor or forced labor in a company’s supply chain creates a risk of potentially costly lawsuits and government investigations.9

GM provides insufficient information on the extent to which its supply chain involves or depends on the direct or indirect exploitation of child labor and other human-rights violations outside the United States. As a result, investors are unable to evaluate whether the company is adequately addressing these material risks.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTNG STATEMENT: Investors are concerned that potential and actual use of child labor in GM’s supply chain poses significant financial, reputational, and legal risks to the company and to investors. Investors seek reliable data to evaluate those risks.

Filed by New Breeze.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.