ALIMENTATION COUCHE-TARD INC. | Disclose comprehensive interim and long-term science-based greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
ATD.B
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • GHG targets / emissions
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
Canada
Supporting materials
  • Alimentation Couche-Tard Proposal Final.pdf Download
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Alimentation Couche-Tard (“ACT”) disclose comprehensive interim and long-term science-based greenhouse gas emissions (“GHG”) reduction targets covering all material emissions in alignment with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C goal and net zero emissions by 2050 or sooner. The company should, at reasonable expense and excluding proprietary information, publish the above by the 2025 Annual Shareholders Meeting.
Whereas clause
Climate change is relevant to ACT both as a significant contributor to global GHG emissions and through its exposure to material physical and transition climate risks.
In its disclosures, ACT recognizes the materiality of climate change and the related risks to which it is exposed, including regulatory, legal, technology, market, and reputation risks, all of which threaten shareholder value if left unaddressed. ACT has described likely financial and strategic impacts of these risks to its business including decreased revenues due to reduced demand for its products and services, and innovations in the market that outpaces its ability to adapt. Given the scope of these climate-related risks, investors would expect the company to adopt clear and ambitious emissions reduction targets as part of its approach to managing them.
ACT states that it aims to reduce the GHG footprint of its fuel offering by 12% by 2025 compared to the fiscal year 2020. This target does not appear to follow any recognized format or target-setting methodology. The baseline emissions, scopes, and percentage of total company emissions covered by the target are not disclosed, leaving investors to guess at possible emissions levels and reductions scenarios. Investors should be able to understand in absolute terms how much a company will be reducing its overall carbon footprint and how these emissions reductions map against each scope of emissions. In contrast with several of its self-identified peers, the company's disclosure and plans currently offer only incomplete information on Scope 1 and 2 and do not address Scope 3.
Internationally recognized standards including the International Financial Reporting Standards, GHG Protocol, and the Science-Based Targets Initiative, provide guidance for emissions reporting and targets. Aligning emissions reporting and target-setting methodologies with these established standards, will enable management to more effectively manage the company's exposure to climate risks while providing investors with more accurate and complete information.
Setting GHG emission targets is critical to ensure ACT’s resilience, competitiveness, and long-term viability in a changing regulatory and market landscape. The company can assure investors that it understands and manages its emissions profile and associated climate risks by disclosing Paris-aligned GHG reduction targets covering all material scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.