Air Transport Services Group Inc | Managing climate risk through science-based targets and transition planning at Air Transport Services Group Inc

Status
29.63% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
4
Resolution details
Company ticker
ATSG
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Set targets or plans
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Industrials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request Air Transport issue near and long-term science-based GHG reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement’s ambition of maintaining global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius and summarize plans to achieve them. The targets should cover the Company’s full range of operational and supply chain emissions.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has advised that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must be halved by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 in order to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Every incremental increase in temperature above 1.5 degrees will entail increasingly severe physical, transition, and systemic risks for companies and investors.
In its 10-K, Air Transport Services Group (“Air Transport” or “the Company”) says that it “may be negatively affected by global climate change or by legal, regulatory or market responses to such climate change.” However, Air Transport’s climate risk mitigation strategy falls short of investor expectations. The Company does not comprehensively disclose its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions – a baseline expectation conducted by many companies worldwide to identify climate risks. While the Company indicates that two of its airlines are committed to net zero by 2050 due to their membership in the International Air Transport Association, the Company itself has not set any interim targets demonstrating its path to net zero.
By contrast, almost 7,000 companies have set, or committed to set, science-based emissions reduction targets through the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). This includes many major airlines and Air Transport’s customer DHL, who has already set a near-term target with SBTi and is committed to net zero. Amazon, another large customer, has committed to net zero by 2040 – 10 years earlier than the Paris Agreement.
Setting targets may help the Company prepare for future regulations, such as proposed updates to the Federal Acquisition Regulation that would require major government contractors to set science-based emissions reduction targets. The U.S. Department of Defense comprised 30% of Air Transport’s consolidated revenues for 2022. The Company may also increase its competitiveness by becoming a sustainable solution for customers who are decarbonizing their supply chains.
Investors believe the Company should adopt science-based targets for its full carbon footprint and publish a climate transition plan – detailing the forward-looking, near-term, and quantitative actions the Company will take to achieve its medium- and long-term sustainability goals.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: In assessing targets, we recommend, at management discretion:

Considering approaches used by advisory groups like SBTi;

Developing a transition plan that shows how the Company plans to meet its goals, taking into consideration criteria used by advisory groups such as the Task Force for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, CDP, Transition Plan Taskforce, and the We Mean Business Coalition; and
Consideration of supporting targets for sustainable aviation fuel, fuel efficiency, and other measures deemed appropriate by management.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.