AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY | Report on Company's policy on merchant category goods at AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY

Status
0.81% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
7
Resolution details
Company ticker
AXP
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Conflict and/or violence
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the American Express Company (the Company) Board of Directors issue a public report, omitting proprietary and privileged information, concerning its oversight of management’s decision-making regarding the potential use of a merchant category code (MCC) for standalone gun and ammunition stores. This report should cover the Company’s governance of MCC standards, as well as disclose and explain the justification for its position on an MCC for gun and ammunition stores, and the risk associated with its position.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: In an effort to appease anti-Second Amendment advocates, the Company previously considered tracking firearms purchases through the use of merchant category codes (though it paused that project in early 2023).1 To do so, the Company would have separately categorized sales at firearms stores, which were previously labeled as “general merchandise” sales.2

Broadly categorizing sales at firearms stores, however, unduly targets those who seek to obtain firearms in a lawful manner and does nothing to address violence by those who obtain firearms through illicit means. Indeed, a University of Pittsburgh study found that lawful gun owners commit less than a fifth of all gun crimes.3

It is also unclear to what extent the merchant category code information from firearm store sales would be shared with law enforcement or other governmental entities. For instance, banks and other card issuers already block card purchases considered risky or prone to fraud and act as agents of the government in monitoring payments for suspicious activity, including transactions that could finance terrorism.4

As such, included in this risk evaluation should be a consideration of whether the best choice is not to track these lawful and constitutionally protected purchases in any way, as well as the dangers associated with sharing any information gathered with government representatives whose use of the information can only be to surveil and harass those who exercise their lawful right to keep and bear Arms.5

About 40% of Americans say they or someone in their household owns a gun, and 22% of individuals (about 72 million people) report owning a gun.6 And given valid concerns over the privacy of gun ownership – case in point, the tracking of purchases from firearms stores by financial institutions – it is very likely those numbers are even higher. The Company should therefore carefully evaluate the potential risks to its bottom-line and its customers before it further embraces the agenda of the anti-Second Amendment lobby.

Given that the original initiative to track gun and ammunition purchases was paused, shareholders would benefit from transparency regarding the issue of how the Board of Directors of American Express is overseeing any final position taken on any MCC application for standalone gun and ammunition stores, and whether American Express is appropriately considering the risks inherent in its oversight of this matter. Failure to do so may expose the Company to regulatory, reputational, and litigation risks that may threaten long-term shareholder value.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.