Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. | Managing climate risk through science-based targets and transition planning at Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.

Status
12.48% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
4
Resolution details
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Set targets or plans
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • GHG targets / emissions
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Knight-Swift issue near and long-term science-based GHG reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement’s ambition of limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C and summarize plans to achieve them. The targets and plan should cover the Company’s full range of operational and supply chain emissions.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has advised that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must be halved by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to limit global warming to 1.5°C. Every incremental increase in temperature above 1.5°C will entail increasingly severe physical, transition, and systemic risks for companies and investors alike.
In its 10-K, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. ("Knight-Swift" or "the Company") acknowledges that requirements to limit vehicle emissions and improve fuel efficiency, many of which are well underway across the U.S., could increase operating costs.
At the same time, The Inflation Reduction Act and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act include billions in federal support for clean vehicle and battery manufacturers, purchasers, and charging infrastructure. Knight-Swift could take advantage of transportation sector incentives such as the 45W commercial vehicle tax credits, which are estimated to direct $3.6 billion toward the cost of purchasing zero-emission trucks during the next ten years.
While Knight-Swift has a goal to reduce fleet emissions intensity per mile 50% by 2035, this goal does not align with limiting warming to 1.5°C and notably excludes Scope 3 emissions, which on average make up 70% of companies’ total emissions footprints.i By contrast, almost 7,000 companies have set, or committed to set, science-based targets through the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi).
Knight-Swift must take additional action to comprehensively address its climate impact and mitigate both the physical risks to its operations and the transition risks associated with new regulation and a global shift to a clean energy economy. Investors believe Knight-Swift should adopt 1.5°C-aligned science-based emissions reduction targets for its full carbon footprint and publish a climate transition plan – detailing the forward-looking, near-term, and quantitative actions the Company will take to achieve its medium and long-term sustainability goals.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: In accessing targets, we recommend,
•Taking into consideration approaches used by advisory groups like SBTi;
•Developing a transition plan that shows how the Company plans to meet its goals, taking into consideration criteria used by advisory groups such as the Task Force for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, CDP, Transition Plan Taskforce, and the We Mean Business Coalition;
•Consideration of supporting targets for fleet electrification and other measures deemed appropriate by management;
•Joining coalitions and/or commitment campaigns that accelerate the deployment of zero-emission vehicles in the U.S., such as the Corporate Electric Vehicle Alliance, Electric Fleet Readiness Group, or EV100

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.