Quest Diagnostics Inc. | Managing Climate Risk Through Science-Based Targets and Transition Planning at Quest Diagnostics Inc.

Status
42.14% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
DGX
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Set targets or plans
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Health Care
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Quest Diagnostics Inc. issue near and long-term science-based greenhouse gas reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement’s ambition of limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C and summarize plans to achieve them.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has advised that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must be halved by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to limit global warming to 1.5°C. Every incremental increase in temperature above 1.5°C will entail increasingly severe physical, transition, and systemic risks for companies and investors alike.



In its 10-K, Quest Diagnostics Inc. (“Quest” or “the Company”) noted the physical risks of extreme weather events caused by climate change on its facilities, employees, consumers, and ability to conduct core business operations. Despite acknowledging these risks, the proponent believes the Company’s mitigation strategy falls short of what is needed to shield Quest and its investors from climate-related risks.



Quest does not have any specific GHG reduction targets. The Company lags peers, who have continued to make progress in managing climate-related risks since a similar proposal received 48% support from investors at Quest’s 2023 annual meeting. Direct competitor Labcorp has now set a near-term sciencebased target with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) that covers Scope 1-3 emissions. Industry peer Thermo Fisher Scientific has since updated its near-term target to 1.5°C alignment and set long-term and net zero targets through SBTi.



With European operations, Quest may be subject to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive requiring disclosure of “plans to ensure that its business model and strategy are compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5°C.”1 Additionally, as a U.S. government contractor, Quest may be subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation proposed rule mandating science-based targets for major suppliers.



Investors believe Quest should adopt 1.5°C-aligned science-based emissions reduction targets for its full carbon footprint and publish a climate transition plan - detailing the forward-looking, near-term, and quantitative actions the Company will take to achieve its medium and long-term sustainability goals. By doing so, the Company may reap benefits from increased efficiency, lower energy costs, more resilient supply chains, and better preparation for climate-related regulations.

Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: In assessing targets, we recommend,



• Taking into consideration approaches used by advisory groups like SBTi;

• Developing a transition plan that shows how the Company plans to meet its goals, taking into consideration criteria used by advisory groups such as the Task Force for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, CDP, Transition Plan Taskforce, and the We Mean Business Coalition; and

• Consideration of supporting targets for renewable energy, energy efficiency, and other measures deemed appropriate by management.

Filed by John Chevedden.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.