Ryder System Inc | Managing Climate Risk Through Science-Based Targets and Transition Planning at Ryder System Inc

Status
22.09% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
4
Resolution details
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Set targets or plans
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Ryder System issue near and long-term science-based greenhouse gas reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement's ambition of limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C and summarize plans to achieve them. The targets and plan should cover the Company's full range of operational and supply chain emissions.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has advised that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must be halved by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to limit global warming to 1.5°C and every incremental increase in temperature above 1.5°C will entail increasingly severe physical, transition, and systemic risks for companies and investors alike.

In its 10-K, Ryder System ("Ryder" or "the Company") says "regulatory efforts to address the effects of global warming and climate change have affected and will likely continue to affect" its business operations. It acknowledges that requirements to reduce vehicle emissions, many of which are well underway across the U.S., could reduce resell value and demand for Ryder's vehicles and services.

At the same time, The Inflation Reduction Act and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act include billions in federal support for vehicle and battery manufacturers, purchasers, and charging infrastructure. Ryder should take advantage of transportation sector incentives such as the 45W commercial vehicle tax credits, which are estimated to direct $3.6 billion toward the cost of purchasing zero-emission trucks during the next ten years.

While Ryder has a goal to reduce emissions from downstream leased assets 15% from 2018, which it achieved ahead of its 2024 target year, it has not outlined plans to strengthen this target in future reporting years to align with science-based reductions across all emissions scopes. By contrast, DHL Group set a near-term target and committed to net zero through the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi).

To appropriately respond to climate-related risks and opportunities, investors believe Ryder should adopt 1.5°C-aligned science-based emissions reduction targets for its full carbon footprint and publish a climate transition plan – detailing the forward-looking, near-term, and quantitative actions the Company will take to achieve its medium- and long-term sustainability goals.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: In assessing targets, we recommend,

•Taking into consideration approaches used by advisory groups like SBTi;
•Developing a transition plan that shows how the Company plans to meet its goals, taking into consideration criteria used by advisory groups such as the Task Force for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, CDP, Transition Plan Taskforce, Climate Action 100+, and the We Mean Business Coalition;
•Consideration of supporting targets for fleet electrification and other measures deemed appropriate by management.
•Applying to join coalitions and/or commitment campaigns that accelerate the deployment of zero emission vehicles in the U.S., such as the Corporate Electric Vehicle Alliance, the Electric Fleet Readiness Group, or EV100.

Filed by John Chevedden.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.