GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. | Board to include one member from Gilead's non-management employees

Status
5.89% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
GILD
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Shareholder rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Health Care
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Stockholders recommend that Gilead Sciences, Inc. (the Company) reform the board structure to include one member of board of directors from the Company’s non-management employees.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: There is a new trend pushing for non-management employee representation on boards, such as shareholder proposals to Amazon and other companies to include non-management employees on board. This is a common practice in Europe and the UK.



American corporate board structure needs reform now. For example, America’s ballooning executive compensation is neither responsible for the society nor sustainable for the economy. There is no rational methodology to decide the executive compensation, particularly there is no companywide union in the Company; there is no employee representation on boards; and the board is nominated and elected without any competition (the number of candidates is the same number of board seats).



It is time for American executives as citizens to take the social responsibility on their own initiative rather than to be forced by the public. The board has the flexibility to design guidelines to select a candidate for the new board nominee from non-management employees.

Filed by Jing Zhao.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.