THE COCA-COLA COMPANY | Report on risks caused by decline in the quality of accessible medical care at THE COCA-COLA COMPANY

Status
9.33% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
8
Resolution details
Company ticker
KO
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Decent work
  • Public health
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Board of Directors issue a public report, omitting confidential information and at reasonable expense, detailing known or potential risks or costs to the Company and its employees caused by the decline in the quality of their accessible medical care and the Company’s strategy to ameliorate these harms.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: Employee wellness is linked to increased productivity and performance.1

Over 20 states have put in place significant healthcare restrictions related to gender-affirming care or reproductive health.2 The Coca-Cola Company (Coke) has operations and employees within these states. These restrictions risk Coke’s employees’ ability to access quality medical care, regardless of the quality of Coke’s own health insurance provisions, as employees rely on the broader healthcare infrastructure available to them.

Abortion bans in particular have reduced the quality and availability of other forms of necessary healthcare.3 These restrictions have implications for all of Coke’s employees’ health and wellness in these states, regardless of fertility status or gender.

A survey published in February 2023, stated that 76% of more than 2,000 current and future physicians would not apply to work or train in states with abortion restrictions. In 2003, states with abortion bans saw a significantly larger decline in medical school seniors applying for residency than states without bans; states with abortion restrictions saw a 10.5% reduction in applicants.4

Coke’s operations and its ability to implement its strategic plan are directly impacted by poor healthcare options for its employees, particularly as the implications of these bans are borne most heavily by women of reproductive age. As Coke states on its website, “We believe that investing in and empowering women not only directly benefits them, but also our business and our communities.”5

According to a 2022 study by the Commonwealth Fund, “Compared to states where abortion is accessible, states that have banned, are planning to ban, or have otherwise restricted abortion have fewer maternity care providers; more maternity care ‘deserts’; higher rates of maternal mortality and infant death, especially among women of color; higher overall death rates for women of reproductive age; and greater racial inequities across their health care systems.”6

Identified harms to Coke’s operations and the implementation of its growth strategy include: employee mortality, reduced employee contribution, state-specific challenges in recruiting and retaining employees, and higher healthcare costs for employees and the Company. However, the extent to with Coke is properly managing and mitigating these risks is opaque to investors.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: It is suggested that this analysis include considerations around and beyond reproductive rights and access to maternal healthcare, detailing any strategies beyond litigation and legal compliance that the Company may deploy to minimize or mitigate these risks.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.