Metro Inc. | In person annual meetings at Metro Inc.

Status
53.81% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
2
Resolution details
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Shareholder rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
Canada
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: It is proposed that the company's annual meetings be held in person, and that virtual meetings be added as a complement to, but not a substitute for,
in-person meetings
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Since 2020, when annual meetings began to be held in virtual mode due to health restrictions relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have had numerous
criticisms regarding the conduct of these meetings.2
The OECD’s Principles of Corporate Governance state:
"[...] due care is required to ensure that remote meetings do not decrease the possibility for shareholders to engage with and ask questions to boards and
management in comparison to physical meetings. Some jurisdictions have issued guidance to facilitate the conduct of remote meetings, including for handling
shareholder questions, responses and their disclosure, with the objective of ensuring transparent consideration of questions by boards and management, including
how questions are collected, combined, answered and disclosed. Such guidance may also address how to deal with technological disruptions that may impede
virtual access to meetings.3

We recognize the benefits of virtual meetings, but they should not be used as a substitute for in-person meetings. Like Teachers’,
4
we believe that annual
shareholder meetings should be held in person, with virtual meetings as a complement (in a hybrid format, such as all banks have done so by 2023), without
replacing in-person meetings. It is understood that all shareholders should enjoy the same rights, regardless of whether they participate in person or remotely. This
position is supported by several organizations, including the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance (CCGG)5
and many major institutional investors

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.