Oshkosh Corporation | Majority vote director election at Oshkosh

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
OSK
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Shareholder rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: That the shareholders of Oshkosh Corporation (“Company”) hereby request that the Board of Directors initiate the appropriate process to amend the Company’s corporate governance documents (certificate of incorporation, articles, or bylaws) to provide that director nominees shall be elected by the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast at an annual meeting of shareholders, with a plurality vote standard retained for contested director elections, that is, when the number of director nominees exceeds the number of board seats.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Corporate shareholders most important board accountability right is their right to vote in director elections. The use of a plurality vote standard in the common uncontested director elections renders these voting rights meaningless. The Company’s Board of Directors has not established a majority vote standard, choosing rather to retain a plurality vote standard for all director elections. Under the Company’s current plurality standard, a board nominee can be elected with as little as a single affirmative vote, even if a nominee receives a substantial majority of so-called “withhold” votes.
The Board must establish a majority vote election standard to afford shareholders a meaningful role in director elections. The broadly adopted majority vote standard is a “majority of votes cast” standard that requires a director nominee to receive more “For” votes than “Against” votes to be elected or re-elected. The proposed majority vote standard is particularly well-suited for the common “uncontested” director elections in which the number of board nominees does not exceed the number of available board seats. Nearly all corporate elections are “uncontested,” and the use of a majority vote standard makes these elections meaningful governance events.
Presently, well over 90% of the companies in the S&P 500 Index and thousands of small and mid-cap companies have adopted a majority vote director election standard in their formal governance documents. Generally, these companies also have adopted director resignation policies to determine the continuing board status of any director nominee that is not elected but continues as a “holdover” director under state corporate law. The Board must take the important first step of establishing a meaningful majority vote standard and then act to adopt a director resignation review process bylaw. The Company’s current director resignation guideline used in conjunction with the plurality vote standard is wholly inadequate. We urge the Board to join the mainstream of major U.S. companies and establish a majority vote standard in director elections.

Filed by Mid America Carpenter Fund.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.