SEMPRA ENERGY | Report on environmental health impacts and management at SEMPRA ENERGY

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
SRE
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Local communities and/or indigenous rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Utilities
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Sempra disclose an environmental justice report on the health and economic impacts that the Cameron LNG Phase I Facility has had on fenceline communities.
Whereas clause
Sempra has a greater than 50% stake in Cameron LNG Phase I, a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) terminal located near northern Calcasieu Lake in Hackberry, Louisiana (“the Facility”).[1] The Facility began its full commercial operations in August 2020 and has one of the largest LNG export capacities in the country.

LNG plants emit carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and volatile organic compounds.[2] Long-term exposure to these pollutants can lead to heart disease, certain types of cancer, and damage to the reproductive system and internal organs.[3] Pollution from LNG terminals “compound the health, economic and educational disadvantages” already faced by nearby communities, leading to increased illnesses that cause work and school absences, as well as increased health care expenses, and an increase in premature deaths.[4]

Operational problems at the Facility have led to widespread community concern regarding environmental injustices. [5]

According to a report by the Louisiana Bucket Brigade, the Facility has had 67 total accidental releases since export operations began in 2020, averaging nearly two accidental releases per month.[6]
A recent report on the health impacts of the Facility estimates the health costs related to the facility to be more than $124 million, accounting for 245 lost workdays, 2,495 lost school days, and 5,000 reported cases of asthma symptoms. [7]
As Parnassus Investment recently noted, “It’s in both the companies’ and neighboring communities’ best interests for companies to prevent, minimize and remedy the harms associated with their chemical use and operational pollution. If they fail to do so, they may jeopardize the long-term growth, longevity and competitiveness of their businesses—and ultimately shareholder value.”[8]

Stakeholders have raised concerns regarding the adverse health effects of LNG operations in Louisiana. The Facility has released reports summarizing community outreach programs, but has not released metrics on adverse health impacts related to its operations. Investors are recommending that companies operating in pollution-heavy industries take a proactive approach to environmental justice to mitigate material risk, while ensuring that fenceline communities have access to clean, safe, and healthy environments.
Supporting statement
Proponents suggest the report include current actions taken by Sempra to address adverse health impacts of its Facility on surrounding communities and actions planned to be taken; data on the Facility’s accidental emissions releases including type, frequency, and amount; frequency of flaring events; information on associated health impacts of unplanned releases; and noise complaints associated with Cameron LNG Phase I operations.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.