OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC. | Adopt GHG targets and issue transition plan (1.5C aligned) at OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
ODFL
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Industrials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request the Board disclose how Old Dominion intends to reduce its Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions in alignment with interim and long-term climate targets aligned with the Paris Agreement.
Whereas clause
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports that immediate emission reductions are required to limit global warming to 1.5°C, thereby avoiding the most catastrophic consequences of climate change. Investor demand for science-aligned emission reduction strategies underscores the reality that companies and investors are increasingly exposed to severe physical, transition, and systemic climate risks.

Old Dominion Freight Line Inc, a leading less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier with a fleet of 10,700 vehicles across the continental United States, faces customer and investor demand for decarbonized supply chains and increasing climate regulations. Despite a shareholder proposal on emissions last year with nearly 25% support, the Company has not demonstrated any meaningful progress.

The Company’s actions remain limited to disclosure of emissions and fuel-efficiency metrics, ongoing route-optimization, and limited pilots of alternative fuels and vehicles.[1] The Company lags competitors in setting emissions reduction targets, integrating alternative vehicles, and providing customer-specific decarbonization services.

Transportation, responsible for 28% of U.S. energy consumption, faces increasing climate-protective regulations. [2] A consortium of 17 states in key operating corridors has set targets to achieve 100% zero-emission truck sales by 2050.[3] California’s Advanced Clean Fleets rule requires commercial fleets to phase out non-zero emission vehicles starting in 2027.[4] Per Old Dominion’s 2024 10-K, the increase in climate-related laws and regulations could increase direct costs and impact operational risks.[5]

Heavy-duty zero-emission vehicle technology is accelerating. Battery-electric Class 8 vehicles are expected to achieve cost parity with diesel models by 2030, driven by higher energy efficiency and lower operating costs.[6] Additionally, current battery technologies provide economically viable alternatives for a variety of other vehicle classes and duty cycles.[7] Setting emissions reduction targets would position Old Dominion to systematically incorporate cost-effective technologies and optimize long-term fleet management.

Competitors in the LTL space, including Knight-Swift Transportation, Werner Enterprises, DHL, and FedEx,[8] have emission reduction targets. DHL and FedEx also provide advanced services to support customer decarbonization, a critical advantage as a growing number of companies set targets to reduce their value chain emissions.[9]

By committing to emission reduction targets and creating a climate transition plan, Old Dominion can address customer, regulatory, and competitive pressures and position itself to benefit from the transition to a low-carbon economy.
Supporting statement
Proponents suggest, at management discretion, the Company disclose:

A timeline for setting emission reduction targets; and
An enterprise-wide emissions transition plan to meet evolving consumer demand and regulations, including anticipated costs and emissions reductions.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.