Dominion Energy (Dominion Energy Resources, Inc.) | Report on stranded carbon asset risks at Dominion Energy (Dominion Energy Resources, Inc.)

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
NYSE: D
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Climate change
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Utilities
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Dominion issue a report by June 1, 2026 at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information describing how it is responding to the liability risks associated with expanding natural gas based infrastructure and suppressing clean energy progress as the courts respond to cases holding gas companies responsible for extreme weather catastrophes.
Whereas clause
Shareholders voted by over 80% at the 2022 Dominion Energy (the Company) annual meeting for the resolution asking for the Company to prepare a Report on the risk and impacts of natural gas use. The resulting 2023 Dominion A Stranded Risk Assessment was inadequate in addressing the Company’s liability risk.

The April 2024 Congressional Joint Staff Report on Denial, Disinformation, and Doublespeak: Big Oil’s Evolving Efforts To Avoid Accountability For Climate Change revealed the following information:

? “New documents demonstrate that Big Oil companies:

? seek to position natural gas as a “bridge fuel” between coal and cleaner, renewable energy, while enmeshing natural gas in the U.S. energy economy for the long-term;

? seek to portray natural gas as a green, climate-friendly fuel, while internally acknowledging that there is significant scientific evidence that the lifecycle emissions from gas are as bad as coal and are incompatible with scientific emissions reduction targets;...

? privately lobby—either directly or through their trade associations— against pro-climate legislation and regulations that they publicly claimed to support;...

? The fossil fuel industry relies on trade associations to spread confusing and misleading narratives and to lobby against climate action. Fossil fuel companies use trade associations, think tanks, and other nonprofits to influence public policy proposals and messaging…”

In 2023 the Supreme Court ruled that the cases holding fossil fuel companies liable for extreme weather destruction must be heard through the state courts.

Shareholders are concerned that future state court rulings could “lead to a “tidal wave” of new cases, similar to the nationwide push that forced tobacco companies to pay billions under a settlement reached in the 1990s”.

Even though methane accelerates extreme weather events, the Company is continuing to work on building new gas infrastructure and interfering with state legislatures, both activities that increase the Company’s liability risk.

The 2023 Dominion A Stranded Risk Assessment included this statement “We acknowledge the risks associated with natural gas bans in certain jurisdictions, and the company is working with policymakers to maintain customers’ access to natural gas in accordance with their preferences and expectations. Legislation preserving customer choice has already been passed in many of the states in which our gas business operates.”

In South Carolina, Dominion Energy and Santee Cooper are lobbying the state legislature to support a 2,000-megawatt natural gas power plant despite regulatory concerns. Farther north, Dominion also plans new gas generation in Virginia. The Company has supported Power For Tomorrow which was responsible for scaring voters to oppose clean energy legislation.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.