COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION | Achieve independently verified deforestation and conversion-free supply chains at COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
COST
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Land use inc. deforestation
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that, within one year, Costco conduct a comprehensive assessment of deforestation risk in its Kirkland Signature brand supply chains, summarize the results in a report to shareholders and, in management's discretion, include feasible, time-bound commitment(s) to eliminate deforestation therein.
Whereas clause
Costco sources beef, palm oil, soy, and paper/pulp. These commodities are leading drivers of deforestation and land conversion, which are responsible for 12–20 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions[1] and 30 percent of the world’s biodiversity decline.[2] The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change identifies exposure to companies who drive deforestation as representing considerable financial, regulatory, and reputational risks to investors.[3]

With stores in Europe and the UK, Costco faces regulatory risk from the EU Deforestation Regulation, which requires that forest-risk commodities placed on EU markets don't come from land deforested or degraded after 2020, and similar legislation developing in the UK.[4] Absent a comprehensive deforestation risk assessment, Costco may be ill-equipped to meet a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape.

In 2023, Costco set a target to reduce its Scope 3 emissions intensity 20 percent by 2030 (excluding fuel). These emissions represent approximately 98 percent of Costco’s climate impact, a significant portion of which comes from crops that drive deforestation.[5] While Costco has committed to mapping 100 percent of its Kirkland Signature priority commodity supply chains by 2030,[6] this necessary first step is too slow to ensure that Costco mitigates deforestation risk on a timely basis to deliver on its 2030 climate commitment.

Further, without a comprehensive deforestation risk assessment and correlated deforestation elimination target(s), Costco increasingly lags peer companies:

Walmart enlisted third parties to conduct multiple deforestation risk assessments[7] and aims to source palm oil, beef, soy, and pulp/paper deforestation-free by 2025.[8]
Amazon enlisted a third-party consultancy to conduct a risk assessment of private brands’ soy supply chains.[9]
Target assessed environmental risks of owned brands at the source level for forest products and palm oil[10] and committed to deforestation-free palm oil by 2025.[11]
Carrefour pledged that by 2025, owned-brand products must use soybeans for animal feed that are not derived from deforestation or conversion.[12]
Kroger will source deforestation-free soy and beef used in manufacturing plants by 2025, and for owned-brand products by 2030.[13]
In neglecting to ensure its supply chain does not contribute to deforestation, Costco exacerbates financial risk by supporting the degradation of systems upon which agricultural productivity depends. It also lags the standards of peers, investors, regulators and global standard-setting bodies,[14] thereby exposing the company to undue financial risk.
Supporting statement
In producing the above, proponents suggest management also consider:

Including forest degradation assessment and target-setting;
Adopting third party monitoring and verification processes;
Applying guidance from the Science-Based Targets initiative; and
Annual disclosure of progress.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.