THE COCA-COLA COMPANY | Report on food waste management at THE COCA-COLA COMPANY

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
KO
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Waste and pollution
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders ask Coca-Cola to publish a report that: (1) identifies the types and quantities of food and beverage waste in its global waste streams (including related disposal methods), and (2) establishes measurable/timebound targets for reducing that waste.
Supporting statement
DEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS:

Coca-Cola’s 2022 Business & Sustainability Report is replete with pledges to reduce certain types of waste, and even has a seven-page section titled, “Packaging: World Without Waste.” But it never once addresses, nor even references, food waste. Neither does its 2023 Environmental Update (published August 2024).

This is perhaps especially relevant for Costa Coffee.

Coca-Cola owns Costa Coffee, which has nearly 4,000 cafés and 14,000 self-serve coffee bars worldwide, the food waste from which poses significant social, environmental, and economic concerns. For example, decomposing food in landfills generates significant greenhouse gas emissions and wasted food production consumes vast amounts of freshwater, fertilizer, and cropland.

Reducing food waste, however, mitigates such concerns—while also providing financial advantages.

In fact, a study by Champions 12.3—whose leadership includes the CEOs of Nestle and Rabobank, as well as the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture and Chief Economist for the U.N. Food & Agriculture Organization—found that “for every $1 restaurants invested to cut down on food waste, they saved on average $7 in operating costs over a three-year period. That’s a 600% return on investment.”

Further, Glass Lewis calls food waste “a growing issue that affects companies and their stakeholders and that has significant economic and environmental and social ramifications.” And Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) says it’s “a growing area of concern globally and...is also starting to be addressed by regulators.”

Yet, neither Coca-Cola nor Costa discloses food waste measurements or measurable/timebound reduction targets.

Coca-Cola has such targets for other waste though. So does Costa—like serving 25% of its beverages in reusable or refillable containers by 2030. Costa also has a surplus food donation policy and states, only generally, that it has some other food waste objectives.

But for years now, Costa’s website has included this claim: “We’re striving to get better data on exactly how much food gets wasted across our stores, so that we can put in place interim targets to achieve our ultimate aspiration that ‘no edible food should go to waste’.”

After years of striving though, shareholders still await the data and targets.

By contrast, for example, Starbucks—a major Costa competitor—measured and disclosed the types/quantities of food and beverages in its waste streams (including disposal methods) years ago and has a measurable target to halve its food waste by 2030.1,2

We agree with BlackRock: “The need for solutions that...lower food waste and provide alternatives to scarce resources has never been greater.”

Looking ahead, we believe identifying food waste totals and implementing timebound reduction targets would substantially advance the company’s management of this hugely consequential issue. Thank you.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.