THE COCA-COLA COMPANY | Alignment of Stated Corporate Values with Political and Electioneering Expenditures at THE COCA-COLA COMPANY

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
KO
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Coca-Cola Board of Directors prepare and publish a report at least six months prior to the next Annual General Meeting, at reasonable expense, analyzing the negative impacts to our brand image, culture, customer base, and shareholder value of associating our brand with politically divisive events that contravene our publicly stated goals and public commitments.
Whereas clause
On September 13, 2024, Coca-Cola’s CEO, Director of Corporate Governance, VP & Head of Investor Relations, and Associate General Counsel & Corporate Secretary received a letter signed by investors with over $63 billion in assets.[1] The letter inquired as to why Coca-Cola was sponsoring a conference featuring keynote speaker Chris Rufo, a high-pro?le, right-wing radical activist who has been leading attacks against marginalized communities, ?rst by weaponizing a distorted version of “critical race theory” and then by linking LGBTQ-inclusive education practices to pedophilic “grooming.”[2]

Shareholders want to be con?dent that our Board of Directors and executives are focused on ensuring that our brand will attract the best and brightest employees, the most loyal customers, and long-term shareholders. The decision to sponsor the Canada Strong and Free event on September 21, 2024, featuring Chris Rufo associates our brand with divisiveness, homophobia, hate speech, and far-right radical activism. These associations diminish our brand equity and goodwill, alienate many of our customers, and harm our ability to retain top talent.

Coca-Cola’s DEI webpage is titled: “Creating a culture of diversity, equity and inclusion.” It continues, “Diversity, equity and inclusion are at the heart of our values and our growth strategy and play an important part in our company's success. We leverage the remarkable diversity of people across the world to achieve our purpose of refreshing the world and making a difference. Our aspiration is not only to mirror the diversity of the communities where we operate, but also to lead and advocate for a better shared future.”[3]

The sponsorship of this conference, with Chris Rufo as a keynote speaker, is fundamentally misaligned with the Company’s stated goals and values related to diversity, inclusion, and civil rights.

The end result of our Company’s logo on Canada Strong’s website is that we have seen media coverage calling out Coca-Cola’s hypocrisy including stories in Forbes, Popular Information, as well as a video posted on X that asks, “Why is Coca-Cola associating itself with divisiveness and homophobia?”[4] The video contrasts Chris Rufo’s racist statements with Coca-Cola’s declaration that: “We do not tolerate racism or discrimination of any kind. Coca-Cola has always stood for optimism, diversity and inclusion.” The video ends by asking Coca-Cola to choose “Harmony” over “Harm.”[5]
Supporting statement
Shareholders recommend, at Board and management discretion, that the report outline policies that can be put in place to avoid such risks in the future.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.