PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION | DEI Disclosure and Racial Justice Scorecard Results at PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
PPC
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Pilgrim’s Pride issue a public report on the effectiveness of the Company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts.
Whereas clause
Following George Floyd’s murder by police officers on May 25, 2020, a majority of the largest 1,000 public corporations made statements expressing their plans to address racial justice, thereby taking an important step in acknowledging diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI) and racial equity as core to their businesses. Shareholders now seek quantitative, comparable data to understand if and how companies are following through on their commitments to racial equity.

Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. appears to be falling behind its peers in its DEI policies and practices. For example, Pilgrim’s earned a 2% score on As You Sow’s latest Racial Justice Scorecard.[1] The Company’s score ranks below that of peer company Hormel Foods Corp., which scored 24%. Pilgrim’s low score is primarily due to a lack of publicly accessible DEI data and the Company’s failure to disclose information regarding its DEI policies and practices.

Numerous studies have demonstrated the financial benefits of a diverse, inclusive workplace, highlighting the fact that a lack of public disclosure of DEI policies and practices and related quantifiable data raises material risk of reduced brand value and financial performance:

A McKinsey study listing the material benefits associated with policies promoting racial justice found that companies with the strongest racial and ethnic diversity are 35% more likely to outperform their industry medians for earnings before interest and tax.[2]

According to CEO Action, fostering inclusivity is a strategic advantage for businesses and research has shown that “organizations that lead with inclusion are eight times more likely to have better business outcomes.”[3]

A U.S. Chamber of Commerce survey found that companies that form identity-based Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) can increase the number of diverse job applicants they receive, noting that 70% of Gen Z respondents were more likely to apply for a job at a company with an ERG[4]

According to a recent CNBC survey, 80% of workers prefer to work for a company that values DEI[5]

Given recent negative press Pilgrim’s has received regarding workers’ rights issues,[6] shareholders are strongly interested in understanding Pilgrim's internal DEI policies and reviewing quantitative data demonstrating their effectiveness. Pilgrim’s failure to disclose this information raises a material risk of reduced brand value and financial performance.

Pilgrim’s Pride can improve its performance and reduce material risks posed by inadequate DEI policies and practices, while also playing an important role in furthering corporate racial equity, by disclosing its DEI policies and data regarding their success.
Supporting statement
Proponents suggest the public report disclose existing DEI policies and practices, as well as relevant information, such as:

Creation of ERGs for BIPOC employees;

DEI-related training for employees;

Release of the company’s EEO-1 form.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.