Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | Exit the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) and the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
CM:CN
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Other ask
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
Canada
Resolved clause
That the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (“CIBC”) exit both the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) and the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ).
Supporting statement
Bank-led and U.N.-convened, the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) is a subgroup of the U.N.-Sponsored and
Mark Carney-led Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ). Signed by the bank CEO, the Commitment
Statement is a prerequisite for joining the Net Zero Banking Alliance.
By joining NZBA in 2021, CIBC committed to aligning its loans, investments and underwriting activities with
the goal of achieving Net Zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. This poses a serious threat to Canadian and
global energy security.
Energy has long been a central pillar of the Canadian economy, and as a stable, responsible, and democratic
country with abundant energy resources, Canada is uniquely positioned to meet more of the world’s demand for
oil and gas. Canada produces and exports energy now and has enormous capacity to do more of both, meaning
our industry can play a key role in maintaining our own energy security, and in ensuring global energy security.
In pledging to comply with NZBA and GFANZ rules and denying our energy companies the capital – in the form
of loans, investments, and underwriting activities – that they need to operate and thrive, Canadian banks are
doing harm not just to their shareholders, but to the country at large, and ultimately to the global community.
We are calling on CIBC to leave the NZBA and the GFANZ. The whims of a select group of unelected and
unaccountable individuals working through a supra-national organization should not be the rationale for
domestic policy. National security, and the security of our allies, should be.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.