Carrier Global | Transparency in Lobbying at Carrier Global

Status
Filed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Resolved, the shareowners of Carrier request the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing:
1 Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications.
2 Payments by Carrier used for (a) director or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including
the amount of the payment and the recipient.
3 Carrier’s membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation.
4 Description of management’s decision-making process and the Board’s oversight for making payments described above.
For purposes of this proposal, a “grassroots lobbying communication” is a communication directed to the general public that (a)
refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the
communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. “Indirect lobbying” is lobbying engaged in by a trade
association or other organization of which Carrier is a member.
Both “direct and indirect lobbying” and “grassroots lobbying communications” include efforts at the local, state and federal levels.
The report shall be presented to the Governance Committee and posted on Carrier’s website.
Supporting statement
Full disclosure of Carrier’s lobbying activities and expenditures is needed to assess whether its lobbying is consistent with its
expressed goals and shareholder interests. Carrier spent $8.2 million from 2020 - 2023 on federal lobbying. This does not include
state lobbying, where Carrier also lobbies but disclosure is uneven or absent. For example, Carrier spent $439,000 on lobbying in
California from 2020-2023. Companies can give unlimited amounts to third party groups that spend millions on lobbying and often undisclosed grassroots
activity. These groups may be spending “at least double what’s publicly reported.”1
Carrier fails to disclose its payments to trade
associations and social welfare groups (SWG), or the amounts used for lobbying, to shareholders. Carrier discloses memberships
in the Business Roundtable and National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), which together have spent over $625 million on
federal lobbying since 1998, and fails to disclose memberships in social welfare groups that lobby, like the Alliance for
Competitive Taxation.
Carrier’s lack of disclosure presents reputational risk when its lobbying contradicts company public positions. For example, Carrier
publicly supports addressing climate change and, as a provider of healthy, safe, sustainable and intelligent building and cold chain
solutions, ranked eighth on Barron’s 2023 list of the 100 most sustainable companies.2
Yet the Business Roundtable filed an
amicus brief opposing the Securities and Exchange Commission climate risk disclosure rules3
and NAM leverages its “influence to
obstruct climate policy progress in the U.S. at the federal, state and local levels.”4
Reputational damage stemming from these misalignments could harm shareholder value. Shareholders ask Carrier to expand its
lobbying disclosure

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.