Post Holdings Inc | Director Election Resignation Guideline at Post Holdings Inc

Status
14.40% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
8
Resolution details
Company ticker
POST
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Shareholder rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
The shareholders of Post Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) request that the Board adopt a new Director Election Resignation Governance Guideline
(“Resignation Guideline”) provision in its corporate governance guidelines to address those situations when one or more incumbent Board nominees fail to
receive the required majority vote for re-election. The Resignation Guideline shall provide that each director upon joining the Board tender an irrevocable
conditional resignation conditioned on the director’s failure to receive the required majority vote support in an uncontested election. The Resignation
Guideline shall provide that the Board is expected to accept a tendered resignation absent a finding of a compelling reason or reasons to reject the resignation,
as determined by the Board in the exercise of its business judgment. The Resignation Guideline shall further stipulate that if a director’s resignation is rejected
and the director remains as a holdover director but is not re-elected at the next annual meeting of shareholders, that director’s second tendered resignation shall
be effective ninety days after the vote certification.
Supporting statement
The Resignation Guideline sets a demanding director resignation governance guideline to reflect shareholder voting sentiment in
director elections. Missouri corporate law states that a director shall hold office for the term for which he or she is elected or until his or her successor shall
have been elected and qualified. An incumbent director who fails to receive the required vote for election may continue to serve as a holdover director.
The proposed Resignation Guideline sets a demanding director resignation review process, requiring directors to articulate a compelling reason or reasons
when they reject a tendered resignation and allow an unelected director to continue to serve. Importantly, the Resignation Guideline further holds that if a
holdover director again fails to be re-elected at the next annual meeting of shareholders, a new tendered resignation will be effective ninety days following the
election vote certification. While the Resignation Guideline provides the Board latitude to reject the initial resignation of an incumbent director who fails to
receive majority vote support, it honors the shareholder vote as the final word on a holdover director’s second election defeat.
Shareholder director election voting rights under Missouri corporate law are foundational rights in the governance of corporations. The majority vote director
election standard adopted by the Company gives shareholders voting rights that have legal effect. It is important that corporate director resignation policies,
guidelines, and bylaws not undermine shareholder voting rights. The proposed Resignation Guideline establishes shareholder voting in director elections as a
more consequential governance right, striking a proper balance between board discretion and shareholder voting rights.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.