Walmart, Inc | Racial Equity Audit at Walmart, Inc.

Status
6.85% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
WMT
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request Walmart Inc. (?Walmart? or the ?Company?) conduct a third-party, independent racial equity audit analyzing Walmart's adverse impacts on Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) communities, and providing recommendations for improving the company's racial equity impact. Input from employees, customers, and racial justice, labor, and civil rights organizations should be considered in determining specific matters to be analyzed. A report on the audit, prepared at reasonable cost and omitting confidential and proprietary information, should be published on Walmart's website.
Supporting statement
As the leading retailer, grocer, and private employer,1 Walmart wields significant influence over the U.S. labor market and economy.2 Company policies and practices disproportionately impact BIPOC and female workers, as Walmart employs more Black people and women than any other U.S. company.3 In November 2024, Walmart rolled back its diversity initiatives, cutting racial equity training and eliminating supplier diversity programs.4 The decision was criticized by the NAACP5, the National Urban League6 and Walmart associates.7 Shareholders worry the move clashes with the Company?s stated commitment to fostering inclusion and opportunity for all and disregards evidence that DEI initiatives boost motivation and reduce attrition.8 Moreover, racial inequity poses macroeconomic risks that jeopardize long-term returns across asset classes by generating industry and economy-wide negative externalities and impeding inclusive and broad-based economic growth. A recent Citigroup study found racism and discrimination have cost the U.S. GDP $16 trillion since 2000 and addressing racial discrimination against African Americans could boost the U.S. economy by $5 trillion over ?ve years.9 Several aspects of Walmart's business suggest a racial equity audit would help mitigate reputational, regulatory, legal, macroeconomic, and human capital risk. The Company reports that people of color comprise 51% of its domestic workforce but make up only 30% of U.S. Of?cers10 and 18% of its Board of Directors.11 Walmart has also faced negative media attention over claims of racial pro?ling12, discriminatory hiring13 and promotion practices14, as well as poor working conditions15 and low wages.16 Political spending and lobbying may also have adverse racial impacts. In 2024, Walmart donated $7.5 million, including $3.5 million toward the passage of California's Proposition 36, a tough-on-crime initiative reclassifying petty misdemeanors as felonies.17 The California Secretary of State said the measure would increase the State prison and County jail population,18 a known cause of race-related economic inequality.19 Given its worker demographics and scale, we request Walmart assess its behavior through a racial equity lens to obtain a complete picture of how it contributes to, and could help dismantle, social and economic inequality. A racial equity audit would help Walmart identify, remedy and avoid adverse impacts on nonwhite stakeholders, communities of color, and long-term diversified shareholders. Failure to effectively address inequities in its operations exposes stakeholders, including employees, to unacceptable abuses and exposes Walmart to risks that may ultimately affect shareholder long-term value. 1

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation nameDeclared voting intentionsRationale
Rothschild & co Asset ManagementFor
Anima SgrForThe proposed independent audit would enable shareholders to better assess and monitor the company’s management and oversight of related risks, as well as the effectiveness of its policies and initiatives.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.