Markel Group Inc | Report on GHG emissions at Markel Group Inc

Status
Filed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • GHG targets / emissions
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Markel issue a report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary
information, disclosing the GHG emissions from its underwriting, insuring, and investment activities that account
for major sources of its total GHG footprint.
Whereas clause
Whereas: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change advises that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must be
halved by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to avoid the worst consequences of climate change. Each 1°C
temperature rise costs global GDP 12% and further increases severe physical, transition, and systemic risks for
companies and investors.[1]
The insurance industry faces heightened risks as climate change increases insured losses and reinsurance prices
while decreasing insurable assets.[2] 2023 had the most billion-dollar climate disasters in one year,[3] and insurance
companies can bear over a quarter of disaster costs.[4] Global insured losses from natural disasters reached $118
billion in 2023, well above 21st century averages, with 67% of insured losses occurring in the U.S.[5]
Markel is exposed to climate risk as a long-term investor and underwriter of fossil fuel projects poised to intensify
climate change. In its 10-K, Markel acknowledges climate change “may result in insured losses that exceed our
expectations, make it more difficult or expensive for us to obtain reinsurance at desired levels, or increase physical
risks to... our operations.” Regarding its casualty risk exposure, Markel’s website states, “Now is the time for the
industry to wake up and start creating tools to prepare for potential systemic and clash events associated with climate
change.”[6]
Nevertheless, Markel neither discloses GHG emissions data nor publishes a sustainability report. Thus, Markel fails
to align with its public statements, and investors are left uncertain about the extent to which Markel is exposed to the
risks outlined in its 10-K and how, if at all, its business considers climate risks. Further, the company has not taken
any action in response to a 2024 shareholder proposal requesting GHG emissions disclosures that received a 37.9%
vote.
Peers including Travelers[7] and AIG[8] have begun disclosing emissions financed emissions in their sustainability
reports, among others. Allianz,[9] Achmea,[10] NN Group,[11] and Swiss Re[12] also disclose insurance-associated
emissions, including steps reduce them. Forthcoming regulations from the European Union and California require
Markel to disclose GHG emissions and climate mitigation strategies.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: In preparing the report, proponents suggest, at management’s discretion:
• Considering GHG emissions disclosure guidance, including the GHG Protocol and Partnership for Carbon
Accounting Financials' Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standards for Insurance Associated
Emissions;[13] and
• Reporting may be based on reasonable emissions estimates, prioritize disclosure for the largest GHG
sources or sectors, be updated annually, and provide timelines for issuing or completing disclosures.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.