COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY | Adopt GHG targets and issue transition plan (1.5°C aligned) at COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY

Status
Omitted
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
COLM
Resolution ask
Set targets or plans
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • GHG targets / emissions
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Columbia adopt targets for measurably reducing
its GHG emissions—and report annually, at reasonable expense and excluding
proprietary information, on its progress toward those targets.
Whereas clause
Whereas: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) advises that
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must be halved by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to
limit global warming to 1.5 °C. Each 1°C temperature rise reduces global GDP up to 12% and entails increasingly severe physical, transition, and systemic risks for companies and
investors alike.1
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) advises the apparel and footwear industry to
reduce emissions at least 4.2% per year to limit warming to 1.5°C.2
Yet, an analysis of
the largest retailers reporting to CDP found that 63% will need to accelerate emissions
reductions to reach their 2030 goals.3
Without action, the industry’s GHG emissions are
expected to increase nearly 30% by 2030.4
In its 10-K, Columbia Sportswear Company (Columbia) acknowledges that “climate
change and natural disasters... could disrupt our operations, the operations of our vendors
and other suppliers or result in economic instability.” CEO Tim Boyle recently asserted
that “warm weather has curbed early season demand for Fall 2024 cold weather product”
and negatively impacted 2023 sales.5
Further, Climate change is poised to produce more
intense and frequent weather events in Columbia’s critical manufacturing countries,
including Vietnam, Bangladesh, and China.6
By 2030, extreme weather could jeopardize
nearly $65 billion worth of exports in the footwear and apparel industry7
Although Columbia committed to a 30% reduction in Scope 3 manufacturing emissions
by 2030 in 2020, it stopped tracking and reporting on this goal in 2023 and has yet to
adopt new GHG reduction targets. Further, Columbia’s prior target failed to meet SBTi
recommendations that Scope 3 targets cover at least 67% of Scope 3 emissions.8
Without
ambitious science-based targets to reduce GHG emissions, investors are unable to
determine if Columbia is sufficiently mitigating climate-related risks.
Columbia lags its peers in the footwear and apparel industry. Competitors Nike, Deckers
Outdoor Corp., VF Corp., Puma, Under Armour, New Balance, Adidas, Amer Sports,
Lululemon, and Hanesbrands are among the 563 textiles, apparel, and footwear
companies with SBTi verified emissions reduction targets or commitments to establish
them.9
Nike, New Balance, Adidas, and Puma have also disclosed climate transition plans
to achieve GHG emissions reduction goals.
Supporting statement
Supporting Statement
In assessing targets, proponents recommend, at the board and management’s discretion:
 Including the full range of Columbia’s operational and supply chain emissions;
 Seeking independent verification of emissions estimation and disclosure;
 Considering frameworks, benchmarks and processes developed by credible third parties
such as SBTi, IPCC, Transition Plan Taskforce, and Task Force for Climate-Related
Financial Disclosures.
A copy of the Proposal, as well as related correspondence from the Proponent, is attached to this
letter as Exhibit A. A copy of additional communications with the Proponent following
submission of the Proposal is attached to this letter as Exhibit B.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.