MERCK & CO., INC. | Tax transparency report at MERCK & CO., INC.

Status
Filed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
MRK
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Tax
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Health Care
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders of Merck request that the Board of Directors issue a tax transparency report to shareholders, at reasonable expense and excluding confidential information, prepared in consideration of the indicators and guidelines set forth in the Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) Tax Standard.
Supporting statement
"Merck’s tax practices and failure to disclose to shareholders in a timely manner have harmed our company’s reputation, resulting in an investigation in to whether Merck avoided billions of dollars in taxes on its top-selling cancer drug Keytruda by booking all the profits from the treatment outside of the United States.1 A pro-active increase in tax transparency is required to restore Merck’s reputation and to prevent potential tax liabilities.

Currently, Merck does not disclose revenues or profits in non-US markets, and foreign tax payments are not disaggregated, challenging investors’ ability to evaluate the risks to Merck of taxation reforms, or whether Merck is engaged in responsible tax practices that ensure long term value creation for the company and communities where it operates. Merck’s alleged shifting of Keytruda profits to the Netherlands are central to current scrutiny of its tax practices.2

Global tax reforms, negotiated by the OECD, are now being implemented by countries around the world. There are growing demands for the United Nations to play a stronger role in future international tax discussions to ensure multinationals pay tax where profits are genuinely earned. In the US, the Financial Accounting Standards Board has adopted significant new reporting requirements on tax payments which will go into effect in 2025. A European Union directive to implement a form of public country by country reporting (CbCR) has gone into effect in 2024.3 Recently passed legislation in Australia to require public CbCR following the GRI Tax Standard follows the same timeframe.4

This proposal would bring Merck’s disclosures in line with leading companies who already report using the Tax Standard.5 The reporting burden is negligible as Merck already reports similar confidential CbCR information shared with OECD tax authorities.

The GRI Standards are the world’s most utilized reporting standard and actively supported by global investors representing over $10 trillion.6 The GRI Tax Standard was developed in response to investor concerns regarding the lack of corporate tax transparency and the impact of tax avoidance on governments’ ability to fund services and support sustainable development. It is the first comprehensive, global standard for public tax disclosure and requires public reporting of a company’s business activities, including revenues, profits and losses and tax payments within each jurisdiction.7

Profit shifting by corporations is estimated to cost the US government $70 – 100 billion annually.8 Globally, OECD data suggests annual revenue losses of $245 billion.9 The PRI states that tax avoidance is key driver of global inequality.10 Further reforms and greater global scrutiny of Merck’s tax practices will continue to put shareholders at risk without greater transparency."

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation nameDeclared voting intentionsRationale
Kutxabank Gestion SGIIC SAU.For
THEMATICS Asset ManagementFor
Rothschild & co Asset ManagementFor
Anima SgrForShareholders may benefit from enhanced disclosure of the company’s tax practices, as this would support a more thorough assessment of the company’s approach to tax management and oversight.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.