MASTERCARD INCORPORATED | Transparency in lobbying at MASTERCARD INCORPORATED

Status
Filed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
10
Resolution details
Company ticker
MA
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Technology
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
MasterCard shareholders request the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing:
1.Company policies and procedures governing direct and indirect lobbying;
2.Payments by MasterCard used for direct or indirect lobbying; including in each indirect case the aggregate amount of any payments and the recipient; and
3.Description of management’s decision-making process and the Board’s oversight for making payments described in section 2 above.
For purposes of this proposal, “indirect lobbying” is lobbying engaged in by a trade association or other organization of which MasterCard is a member or to which it contributes. “Direct and indirect lobbying” include efforts at the territorial, local, state and federal levels, including lobbying outside the United States
The report shall be posted on MasterCard’s website.
Supporting statement
Fuller disclosure of MasterCard’s lobbying activities and expenditures is needed to assess whether MasterCard’s lobbying is
consistent with its expressed goals and stockholder interests. MasterCard spent $51 million from 2010-2023 on federal lobbying. This does not include state lobbying, where MasterCard also lobbies. And MasterCard lobbies abroad, spending between €800,000 - 899,999 on lobbying in Europe for 2023. MasterCard’s lobbying over swipe fees continues to attract media scrutiny.1
Companies can give unlimited amounts to third party groups that spend millions on lobbying.2 MasterCard fails to disclose its payments to trade associations and social welfare groups, or the amounts used for lobbying, to stockholders. MasterCard does provide incomplete disclosure, giving a percent of an unknown amount of dues above $25,000 spent on lobbying for its trade association and social welfare group memberships. This critically leaves out the actual amounts of MasterCard’s payments being spent on lobbying. MasterCard belongs to the Business Roundtable and US Chamber Commerce, which together have spent over $2.3 billion on federal lobbying since 1998, and supports social welfare groups like the Future of Privacy Forum and State Government Affairs Council.
MasterCard’s lack of disclosure presents reputational risk when its lobbying contradicts company public positions. MasterCard supports addressing climate change, yet the Business Roundtable filed an amicus brief opposing the Securities and Exchange Commission climate risk disclosure rules3 and the Chamber opposed the Paris climate accord.
Fuller disclosure of lobbying policies, expenditures, and decision-making processes would allow shareholders to evaluate the risks created by MasterCard’s lobbying activities. Improved MasterCard lobbying spending disclosure will protect the reputation of MasterCard and preserve shareholder value.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.