Power Corporation of Canada | Advisory vote on environmental policies at Power Corporation of Canada

Status
AGM passed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
3
Resolution details
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Climate change
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Energy
Company HQ country
Canada
Resolved clause
It is proposed that Power adopt a policy on annual advisory vote with respect to its environmental and climate objectives and action plan.
Supporting statement
"Since the adoption in 2019 of specific amendments to the Canada Securities
Act [sic] (the “CBCA”), the board of directors may take into account, among
other factors, the interests of the shareholders, the employees, the creditors,
the consumers and the governments, as well as the environment, in their
decision-making process. More recently, a public bill was introduced in
the Senate, which could eventually be named the 21st Century Business
Act (“Bill S-285”[1]), proposing substantive changes to the Canada Business
Corporations Act (the “CBCA”). The proposed legislation defines the
“purpose” of business corporations, while linking the fiduciary duties of
directors and officers to this new concept. According to a potential new
section of the CBCA, a “corporation’s purpose” would mean the following:
“to pursue its best interests while also operating in a manner that:
a) benefits the wider society and the environment in a manner
proportionate to its size and the nature of its operations; and
b) minimizes any harm that the corporation causes to the wider society
and the environment, with the objective of eliminating such harm.”
The legislator’s preoccupation with environmental issues reflects the
concerns of both the shareholders and the society as a whole about
environmental issues and the impact that organizations can have on them.
We therefore ask the Board of Directors to reconsider its position with regard
to our proposal.
As this proposal has received the support of 11.90% of the votes of holders of
“Subordinate Voting Shares” in the past, we are submitting it again."

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.