Mondelez International, Inc. | Assessment of supplier and partner code of conduct due diligence process at Mondelez International, Inc.

Status
Filed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
MDLZ
Resolution ask
Conduct due diligence, audit or risk/impact assessment
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Decent work
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Stockholders urge the Board of Directors of Mondelēz International, Inc. (the “Company”) to commission an independent, third-party assessment of the Company’s due diligence process to ensure compliance with the Company’s Supplier & Partner Code of Conduct for the internationally recognized human rights of freedom of association and collective bargaining. The assessment, prepared at reasonable cost and omitting legally privileged, confidential, or proprietary information, should be publicly disclosed on the Company’s website.
Supporting statement
Freedom of association and collective bargaining are internationally recognized human rights according to the International Labour Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The United Nations’ Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights urge companies to “know and show” that they respect human rights by adopting “a human rights due diligence process to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for how they address their impacts on human rights.”(1)Our Company has adopted a Supplier & Partner Code of Conduct to require that suppliers and partners “respect employees’ rights to organize and bargain collectively, as well as raise concerns without fear of retaliation.” While the Company’s Supplier & Partner Code of Conduct is commendable, we are concerned that the Company’s corporate reputation and brand names could be harmed if the Company’s due diligence process to ensure its suppliers’ compliance with the Supplier & Partner Code of Conduct fails to prevent workers’ rights violations.For example, the New York Times has alleged that our Company’s contract manufacturing supplier Hearthside Food Solutions (“Hearthside”) violated child labor laws.(2) Hearthside has also faced allegations of violating its workers’ rights to freedom of association and to collectively bargain. In 2021, a Hearthside worker testified before a U.S. Senate Committee about how Hearthside prevented her coworkers from forming a union at a facility in McComb, Ohio.(3) In 2024, a labor union filed various unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board alleging labor law violations at Hearthside’s London, Kentucky facility.(4

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.