Dollarama, Inc. | Disclosure of languages mastered by employees at Dollarama, Inc.

Status
AGM passed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
4
Resolution details
Company ticker
DOL
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
Canada
Resolved clause
"It is proposed that the languages required by the corporation to be mastered by employees be disclosed,
broken down by jurisdiction, for all territories (countries, states, provinces) in which the corporation
operates."
Supporting statement
"“When a candidate is hired, their skills are assessed to determine whether they meet the requirements of
the job for which they are applying. Among these, of course, are language skills. Information on this subject
is known to all companies. This information, in its statistical form, is of interest to everyone.
In recent years, several public controversies over language have tarnished the reputation of major public
companies with regard to their social responsibility and the interpretation that they fulfill their duties and
obligations in respect of diversity which are inherent in our societies. Language, which is at the heart of our
democratic institutions, is in fact a fundamental attribute of the community. Such controversies, which are
harmful in every respect, must be avoided. For this reason – and for several others – it is appropriate for
all interested parties (stakeholders) to know, through formal and official disclosure, the languages mastered
by the corporation’s employees. Obviously, language “mastery” refers to a proficiency level sufficient for
generalized use, verbal and written, across all spheres of activity of both legal and physical persons; a level
of language sufficient to enable each employee to assume their duties and functions fully and completely.” "

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.