Severn Trent Plc | NET ZERO TRANSITION PLAN

Status
AGM passed
AGM date
Resolution details
Submitted by
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Climate change
Type of vote
Other management proposal or proxy item
Filer type
Management
Company HQ country
United Kingdom
Resolved clause
NET ZERO TRANSITION PLAN
3. To consider and, if thought fit, approve the Company’s Net Zero Transition Plan in the form set out in the Company’s Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2025.
Supporting statement
Resolution 3 is a non-binding advisory vote to approve the Net Zero Transition Plan (the ‘Plan’). The Board indicated its intention to put the Plan to shareholders for approval in the Notice of Annual General Meeting published in 2024. The Plan, which can be found on pages 45 to 46 in the 2025 Annual Report, sets out the Company’s climate strategy to reduce emissions within its operations and through its value chain.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation nameDeclared voting intentionsRationale
IrcantecAgainst

The company aims to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 across all its scopes. It states its intention to reduce absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 46.2% by 2031, based on 2020 levels, and to reduce absolute Scope 3 emissions from sold products by 13.5% over the same period. However, this target only covers 5.6% of its Scope 3 emissions in 2024. Additionally, Severn Trent commits to ensuring that 70% of its suppliers set science-based targets by 2026, covering emissions from purchased goods and services, capital goods, upstream transportation and distribution, as well as waste generated from operations.

However, the SBTi targets do not extend beyond 2031, meaning there is no long-term commitment, and there is also no 1.5°C-aligned target for Scope 3, which represents the majority of emissions in 2024. Moreover, emissions are not decreasing; on the contrary, Scope 3 emissions increased by 14.41% in one year. As such, the available information on GHG emissions is unsatisfactory. Regarding its action plan, it is well detailed for Scopes 1 & 2, specifying the contribution of key actions to emissions reductions, but less so for Scope 3, where only a few examples are provided and few elements are quantified. In terms of spending, the company should be commended for publishing its 2025–2030 investment plan aligned with its Net Zero action plan, although it does not break down spending by specific action.

Furthermore, the company does not have a quantified decarbonization target for its entire Scope 3, making it unclear how it plans to achieve its "Net Zero" goals. It also lacks a quantified long-term decarbonization target (beyond 2031) for all its scopes. The exact level of planned offsetting—an important part of the action plan—is not specified, although the strategy includes a significant amount of avoided emissions (116,097 tCO2e in 2024/2025), which are included in the net emissions calculation.

For all these reasons, Ircantec voted against Severn Trent’s Say on Climate resolution, while acknowledging the positive step toward transparency and encouraging the company to continue its efforts by validating long-term science-based emissions reduction targets. Finally, we encourage the company to renew this Say on Climate exercise, as it has committed to doing every three years.



DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.