Mondelez International, Inc. | Report on the impact of the company's policy positions, advocacy and charitable giving on social and political matters at Mondelez International, Inc.

Status
Omitted
AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
MDLZ
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Governance, Membership and Sustainability Committee
of the Board of Directors to report on the impact of the Company’s policy positions, advocacy,
and charitable giving on social and political matters, and the effect of those specific actions on
the Company’s financial sustainability. The Company should issue the report on the committee’s
findings by March 31, 2026, and publish it on the Company website.
Whereas clause
The policy positions of Mondelez International (“Company”) – and its advocacy,
partnerships and charitable giving on significant social policy and political matters – should not
alienate consumers, decrease sales, or diminish shareholder value.
According to 1792 Exchange, Mondelez is a “high risk” investment:1
The company yields to political activism in shaping corporate governance, potentially
alienating consumers, dividing employees, and harming shareholders. The company
implements race and identity-based policies that replace merit, excellence, and integrity
with preferential treatment and outcomes. Mondelez embraces corporate initiatives that
redirect its central focus from business goals to partisan policies and divisive issues.
This approach fails to safeguard free exercise, free speech, and free enterprise.
The Company takes public and politically divisive positions over issues of significant social
policy concern, including support of organizations2 that advocate for gender transition treatments
for children3 4 without parental consent, and by sponsoring events5 that indoctrinate schoolkids
into LGBTQ culture by promoting sexually explicit books in schools and libraries.
6 Mondelez
donated at least $500,000 recently to PFLAG, which aggressively promotes these policies.7
The Company also has a 95 percent rating on the Human Rights Campaign’s “Corporate Equality
Index.”8 Earning that score means compliance with extremely controversial policies, such as
eliminating protections for women by allowing biological men to share their restrooms and
facilities with them, and forcible employee “sensitivity training” that includes gender identity,
sexual orientation, and mandated pronoun preferences.
9
Mondelez also contributed at least $500,000 to the BLM movement and related causes since
2020.10 These causes have been accused of squandering assets11 and supporting racism and
antisemitism,
12 and highly divisive and dangerous programs such as police-defunding and “antiracist” racial discrimination.13
Supporting statement
Recent events have made clear that company bottom-lines, and
therefore value to shareholders, drop when companies take overtly political and divisive
positions that alienate consumers. In 2023, following Bud Light’s embrace of partisanship and
disparagement of its customer base, sales fell roughly 30 percent year-over-year.
14 In 2024,
Harley Davidson expects sales to plummet by at least 10 percent more than previously projected
after a backlash over its diversity, equity and inclusion policies.
15
And in mid-2024, after a social media campaign critical of Mondelez’s partnership of its Oreo
brand with PFLAG,16 reports emerged that detailed “how its popular cookies are being passed
over for cheaper, store-branded treats.”17 Its share price in late November was at its low for the
year, having plummeted by 18 percent in just two months.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.