TESLA MOTORS, INC. | Proposal that Won 54% Support at 2024 Tesla Annual Meeting at Tesla Motors

Status
32.32% votes in favour
AGM date
Proposal number
13
Resolution details
Company ticker
TSLA
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Shareholder rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that our board take each step necessary so that each voting requirement in our charter and bylaws (that is explicit or implicit due to default to state law) that calls for a greater than simple majority vote be replaced by a requirement for a majority of the votes cast for and against applicable proposals, or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws. If necessary this means the closest standard to a majority of the votes cast for and against such proposals consistent with applicable laws. This includes making the necessary changes in plain English.
Shareholders are willing to pay a premium for shares of companies that have excellent corporate governance. Lumen Technologies’ supermajority voting requirements have been found to be one of 6 entrenching mechanisms that are negatively related to company performance according to “What Matters in Corporate Governance” by Lucien Bebchuk, Alma Cohen and Allen Ferrell of the Harvard Law School. Supermajority requirements can be used to block proposals that increase shareholder rights, that are supported by most shareholders, but opposed by an entrenched Board of Directors.
This proposal topic won 54% majority support at Tesla in 2024 even when the biased Tesla insider shares were opposed.
This proposal topic was previously approved by more than 50% of Tesla shareholders at the 2020 Tesla annual meeting. Thus it should have been adopted as a Board supported Tesla proposal in 2021. The responsibility for this proposal topic not being adopted earlier falls on the Tesla Board of Directors.
In order to determine whether the Tesla Board is now serious about adopting this important proposal topic it would be useful to shareholders for the Board of Directors to prepare a detailed report, omitting proprietary data, on the Board of Directors’ expenses to proxy solicitors and other vendors to obtain the challenging supermajority approval requirement from all shares outstanding on this proposal topic when less such supermajority of Tesla shares typically cast ballots. This report need not be prepared if each next Tesla Board of Directors’ proposal on this important topic receive the required supermajority vote.
At least such a preliminary report shall be included with the Item 5.07 filing within 4-days of the annual meeting and a final report shall be included in an Item 5.07 filing within 30-days of the annual meeting as part of this comprehensive simple majority vote proposal which has the objective of being adopted as a binding Tesla proposal.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.