APPLE INC. | China Entanglement Audit

Status
Filed
AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
AAPL
Resolution ask
Conduct due diligence, audit or risk/impact assessment
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Other
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Technology
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Board of Directors of Apple conduct an evaluation and issue a report within the next year,
at reasonable cost and excluding confidential information, assessing risks and costs associated with the company’s continued
entanglement with the People’s Republic of China.
Whereas clause
* With escalating U.S.–China trade tensions, Apple could face steep tariff increases. Analysts warn tariffs on Chinese imports
could hit as high as 145%, severely inflating production costs. One article projects this could add $10 billion annually to
iPhone expenses.
* While Apple is apparently shifting some production to India and Vietnam, these regions still depend heavily on Chinese parts,
and manufacturing costs are 5–10% higher.
* China may restrict support from Chinese engineers or suppliers to Apple’s new operations in India—potentially delaying
diversification plans.
* Greater China — encompassing Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan — accounted for nearly 20% of Apple’s revenues—
about $74 billion annually. A regional conflict (e.g., over Taiwan) could abruptly eliminate this, much like Russia‑related
disruptions did for others.
* The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act further complicates matters. Chinese suppliers linked to Xinjiang's labor practices
face U.S. bans, risking supply chain disruptions. Meanwhile, China's control over rare earth minerals—essential for
semiconductors and sensors—gives it leverage to weaponize shortages.
* Apple has previously been the target of Chinese Espionage actions; the company’s proprietary data pertaining to its
autonomous vehicles program was stolen in 2018 and 2019. Since then, Chinese firms have become a global leader in
autonomous vehicles, potentially off the back of Apple’s investment.
* As Patrick McGee makes devastatingly clear in … Apple in China, the American company’s decision … to manufacture about
90 percent of its products in China has created an existential vulnerability not just for Apple, but for the United States—
nurturing the conditions for Chinese technology to outpace American innovation.”
* Apple’s disclosures regarding the foregoing issues have fallen short of adequately informing shareholders.
* Insufficient disclosures can expose Apple to additional litigation risk.
Supporting statement
Shareholders need clear, quantified information on:
1. The financial exposure under high‑tariff scenarios and mitigation strategies.
2. The dollar value of revenues and profits at risk from regulatory or geopolitical actions in China.
3. The danger and risks associated with intellectual property theft from Chinese firms.
4. The timeline and cost implications of supply chain diversification away from China.
A transparent, scenario‑based analysis will help shareholders assess whether current strategies are sufficient to protect Apple’s
profitability and long‑term growth. Without such disclosure, investors cannot adequately evaluate the Company’s resilience in the
face of mounting geopolitical and economic risks.
For these reasons, we urge shareholders to vote FOR this proposal.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.