BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc | Report on Increasing GHG Reduction Ambition

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
BJ:US
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • GHG targets / emissions
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Supporting materials
  • BJ's Wholesale Proposal-Trillium_FINAL 2026.pdf Download
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request BJ’s issue a report, above and beyond existing disclosures, describing if and how it could increase the scale, pace, and rigor of its GHG emissions reduction efforts. The report should be updated annually, prepared at reasonable cost, and omit proprietary information.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: Climate change-driven impacts could erase trillions in global GDP by 2050, posing
macroeconomic risks that may substantively depress returns for long-term diversified investors. ,
Without significant near-term action to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, climate change is predicted to drive severe and costly weather events for many decades. , For companies like BJ’s that rely on a consistent supply of high-quality agricultural products, climate change can pose financial risk as droughts, floods, and heat waves increasingly challenge farmers and meat producers in its supply chain . ,

In 2021, BJ’s identified its climate strategy, energy consumption, and operational and supply chain GHG emissions as material to its business and subsequently committed to set emissions reduction targets. It later narrowed the scope of its planned targets significantly from its full value chain to its operational emissions. However, in 2025, it abandoned its commitment and removed all sustainability-related disclosure from its website including all previous corporate responsibility reports.

This significant reversal raises concerns about company leadership’s execution on its commitments. Further, BJ’s actions are squarely at odds with trends in corporate climate commitments. In its review of 2024 CDP disclosures, PwC writes that, in contrast to recent headlines, companies increased their climate ambition at a rate of 37%, far outweighing those in retreat. The Conference Board draws an identical conclusion, noting that “companies with deep operational integration, value-creation alignment, and stable leadership have proven the most resilient [in keeping their commitments] despite shifting political environments.”

Moreover, BJ’s industry peers such as Costco, ALDI, Kroger, and Albertson’s have set GHG emissions reduction targets and annually publish progress on sourcing clean energy, reducing refrigerant emissions, and minimizing food waste. BJ’s could do the same.

With 30% of the votes cast in favor of this same resolved clause in 2025, we believe it is incumbent upon the company to take concrete steps to respond to investor concerns. In addition, we believe the proposal provides ample flexibility such that board and management can fulfill their respective fiscal responsibilities while driving environmental improvements.



Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: In determining relevant content for the report, we recommend, at management’s discretion, taking into consideration:

• Approaches used by advisory groups like the Science Based Targets initiative.
• Describing strategies, initiatives, metrics, and milestones it could employ to reduce emissions.
• The feasibility of setting targets for renewable energy, energy efficiency, and refrigerant emissions reduction and other measures deemed appropriate by management.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.