Chubb Limited | Claims for climate releated losses at Chubb Limited

Status
Omitted
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
CB
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Climate change
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Chubb issue a third-party report assessing if and how pursuing subrogation claims for climate-related losses would benefit the Company and its insureds, omitting proprietary information, and at reasonable expense.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: The United States is facing a homeowners insurance crisis. In 2023, national insurance underwriting losses reached a 10-year high of $38 billion due to more frequent and intense weather-related disasters, inflation costs associated with rebuilding, and reinsurance price increases. 2024 followed as the second-costliest year for catastrophe losses since 2005. The insurance industry has responded with aggressive rate increases and policy non-renewals. Between 2017 and 2023, homeowners' premiums increased nationwide by 34% and another 10.4% in 2024. Approximately 1.9 million insurance contracts have not been renewed since 2018. While price hikes and non-renewals preserve short-term insurance company profitability, they threaten the sustainability of the homeowners insurance customer base. They also create risk for financial markets. Homeowners insurance enables access to mortgage loans necessary for home purchases; home sales support a range of other businesses while generating property tax revenue for local and state governments. When insurance becomes unaffordable or unavailable, home sales slow, property values decline, and cascading shocks ripple across the housing market and the broader economy. One important means by which insurance companies can stem this crisis is to offset their catastrophe losses through subrogation, an industry practice where insurers pursue contributions for claim payments made from responsible third parties. Seeking contributions from responsible parties not only helps reduce costs borne by insurance companies but maintains affordable premiums and ensures that responsible parties are held accountable for the damage they cause. Chubb experienced $2.4 billion in pre-tax catastrophe losses in 2024 compared with $1.8 billion in 2023. Seeking compensation from parties responsible for causing climate change will allow Chubb to successfully maintain its homeowner business line and serve its customers responsibly. Attribution science has developed sufficiently to assign responsibility for climate change to responsible parties. It can also assess the frequency and intensity of certain types of extreme weather attributable to climate change. Accordingly, recent legislative proposals in California and Hawaii have encouraged insurers to pursue subrogation claims against high-emitting companies for climate-related damages. Chubb has not disclosed whether it is exploring opportunities to recover climate-related damages from responsible parties, even though such actions could reduce claim-related losses, preserve shareholder value, and improve insurance affordability and availability. Shareholders would benefit from understanding whether management is considering this cost-recovery opportunity, the rationale for its approach, and how such strategies could affect the Company’s financial performance under various climate scenarios.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.