AT&T INC. | Report on Transparency in Corporate Charitable Contributions at AT&T INC.

Status
Omitted
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
T
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Telecom
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that AT&T (“the Company”) prepare and annually update a report to shareholders, at reasonable expense and excluding proprietary information, listing and analyzing charitable contributions made during the prior fiscal year. The report should (1) identify organizational or individual recipients of donations in excess of $5,000, (2) describe (for donations already spent) the purposes to which the donations were applied, and the Company’s intentions regarding future donations to the same organizations; (3) highlight philanthropic areas or initiatives considered least germane to corporate value while posing the greatest risk to Company reputation, and (4) include management’s analysis of the risks to AT&T’ brand, reputation, or shareholder value posed by public controversies associated with the donations, including an explanation of the objective and consistent standards by which such controversies were discovered and their effect on the Company gauged.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: Corporations frequently use their platforms to express support for humanitarian causes and human rights. Among the most fundamental of these rights are freedom of speech and freedom of religion, as recognized by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Unfortunately, some companies support nonprofit organizations that actively undermine these freedoms, including through charitable support to nonprofits that influence public policy in ways that restrict free speech and religious liberty. Some of these nonprofits have been widely criticized for (1) partisan or ideological bias, (2) advocating for policies and legislation that may threaten religious freedom, free expression, and parental rights, and/or (3) encouraging companies to adopt controversial healthcare policies or marketing strategies that have led to significant brand damage. Several major brands have already taken steps to reevaluate their charitable giving practices and have distanced themselves from such organizations. However, AT&T continues to receive high plaudits from controversial charitable organizations such as the Human Rights Campaign, on whose Corporate Equality Index the company receives a perfect score. 1 Shareholder proposals regarding reporting on charitable contributions are generally considered appropriate (as noted in SEC precedent) when they concern the corporation’s general contributions. Such contributions are considered matters of corporate policy that are extraordinary in nature and beyond ordinary business operations. This need for transparency is especially relevant for AT&T, given that aside from the company’s Contributions Council2 and grants (approved by the AT&T Foundation Board), AT&T also doubles3 employee donations to eligible nonprofits, amplifying the Company’s philanthropic footprint. This is not merely a political point but an area of investor concern. AT&T is one of the most valuable financial brands in America, with its Brand Finance-estimated $52 billion brand value4 comprising roughly 28 percent of its $182 billion market cap.5 Given this fact, the scale of 1 https://www.hrc.org/resources/corporations/at-t-inc. 2 https://sustainability.att.com/ViewFile?fileGuid=e47f8fb4-3eeb-485e-9fe4-a45c8808a091 3 https://sustainability.att.com/priority-topics/community-engagement 4 https://brandirectory.com/reports/telecoms/2025 5 https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/T/ AT&T’s charitable activities, and the company’s recent laudable pivot6 toward political neutrality, shareholders deserve a consistent framework for understanding how these contributions uphold fiduciary responsibility. Transparent reporting will enhance shareholder trust and ensure that charitable giving continues to reflect the Company’s values and long-term interests.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.