Abbott Laboratories | Disclosure regarding horseshoe crab-derived endotoxin testing at Abbott Laboratories

Status
Withdrawn
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
ABT
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Biodiversity / nature
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Health Care
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Abbott Laboratories issue a report, at reasonable expense and omitting proprietary information, analyzing the supply chain risks of horseshoe crab materials and whether synthetic endotoxin testing alternatives would reduce material risk to the Company.
Whereas clause
Pharmaceutical and medical device companies conduct tests to detect bacterial contamination in injectable drugs, vaccines, and medical devices. While the industry historically relied on blood extracted from horseshoe crabs to conduct such tests, approved and readily available synthetic alternatives are now available. Abbott continues using horseshoe crab blood despite pressure on a keystone species whose eggs provide critical food for at least 11 species of migratory shorebirds and fish species.[1] A decline in horseshoe crabs threatens the entire Atlantic coastal ecosystem. For example, the red knot shorebird population has plummeted 75% since the 1980s,[2] from approximately 50,000 to 13,000 birds, due to horseshoe crab egg depletion.[3]

Declining Crab Population

The biomedical industry harvests blood from millions of horseshoe crabs annually, with morality rates of 15 - 30%.[4] Population declines, tightening harvest regulations, and ongoing environmental litigation are compounding supply-chain vulnerability and elevating regulatory and reputational exposure for companies dependent on this input.[5],[6]

Synthetic Testing Is Now a Cost-Effective and Feasible Replacement

Synthetic alternatives offer more reliable and cost-effective testing for contamination.[7] They avoid quality and supply issues tied to horseshoe crab blood and deliver more consistent results.[8] With new U.S. Pharmacopeia standards taking effect in May 2025, these synthetic alternatives are now fully recognized by regulators – removing the primary adoption barrier.[9]

Abbott is Falling Behind Industry Leaders and Its Competitors

Industry leaders including Eli Lilly (which secured FDA approval for recombinant Factor C-tested drugs in 2018), GSK, Amgen, and Sanofi have adopted synthetic contamination testing, citing reduced costs, quality improvements, and enhanced supply chain security.[10],[11]

Failure to Transition Amid Tightening Regulations and Reduced Supply Poses Material and Reputational Risk

State legislatures are increasingly restricting horseshoe crab harvesting. In 2025, New York banned both commercial and biomedical collection, and similar measures are underway in Connecticut and New Jersey.[12] New regulations are tightening the already limited supply of horseshoe crab blood. Abbott’s continued reliance on horseshoe crab blood exposes the Company to escalating supply, regulatory and reputational risks. Abbott's 10-K highlights that such disruptions can result in "increased costs, lost revenue, [and] damage to customer relations."[13]

Without disclosure on testing methods or a strategy to adopt synthetic alternatives, shareholders cannot assess Abbott’s exposure to regulatory tightening, supply instability, or rising costs. Greater transparency is needed to evaluate how the Company is safeguarding operational continuity and investor returns.

[1] https://www.horseshoecrab.org/nh/eco.html

[2] https://www.usgs.gov/publications/effects-horseshoe-crab-harvest-delaware-bay-red-knots-are-harvest-restrictions-working

[3] https://www.usgs.gov/publications/red-knot-stopover-population-size-and-migration-ecology-delaware-bay-usa-2021

[4] https://whyy.org/articles/delaware-bay-female-horsehoe-crabs-spared-commercial-harvest-2023/

[5] https://www.mass.gov/news/regulatory-updates-2024-q1-and-q2

[6] https://biologicaldiversity.org/w/news/press-releases/maryland-court-orders-release-of-hidden-horseshoe-crab-mortality-data-2025-03-20/

[7] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6200278/

[8] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6200278/

[9] https://www.mbl.edu/news/us-pharmacopeia-oks-synthetic-alternatives-horseshoe-crab-blood

[10] https://reviverestore.org/eli-lily-sets-the-gold-standard-for-sustainable-endotoxin-testing/

[11] https://pharmascore.org/

[12] https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S4289 ; https://portal.ct.gov/governor/news/press-releases/2023/08-2023/governor-lamont-signs-legislation-banning-the-harvesting-of-horseshoe-crabs?language=en_US; https://www.littoralsociety.org/protect-horseshoe-crabs.html

[13] https://www.abbottinvestor.com/static-files/2b75fde0-1c65-4b0e-b0b6-ea78d31cb652

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.