NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION | Report on community impacts related to environmental injustice at NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION

Status
Withdrawn
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
NEM
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Conduct due diligence, audit or risk/impact assessment
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Local communities and/or indigenous rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Materials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Newmont, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, disclose an evaluation conducted by an independent third-party of the impacts of its operations on communities adjacent to mining operations wholly owned by the Company.
Whereas clause
According to Parnassus Investments, companies that fail to manage and reduce their pollution impacts increase exposure to material financial risks, including heightened regulatory scrutiny, potential litigation, operational disruptions, and damage to brand reputation.[1] This is particularly true when company actions create environmental injustice, which amplifies the impacts of the climate crisis on already overburdened communities, reducing their capacity to adapt and recover from climate harm.[2] Investors recognize that unmanaged environmental justice risks can disrupt operations, weaken competitiveness, and erode long-term shareholder value.

Newmont operates in the pollution heavy materials sector, with international mining operations across the globe.[3] Newmont Corporation’s global portfolio includes projects, such as Yanacocha in Peru, Akyem in Ghana, and the former Buyat Bay operation in Indonesia, each of which are documented as having significant impacts on surrounding communities, including land displacement, environmental harms, and disputes over water contamination.[4] Similarly, the Company’s operations at the Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mine in Colorado have raised concerns about the permissible level of air pollution in surrounding communities.[5]

Such incidents which undermine community trust and create tangible social and environmental risks can translate into material operational, financial, and reputational risks for the Company. Community opposition, legal challenges, regulatory scrutiny, and reduced license to operate can disrupt production and increase costs and long-term operating stability.

Newmont’s 2020 global Sustainability and Stakeholder Engagement Policy acknowledges the need to “build trust with communities through transparent and respectful stakeholder engagement and as responsible stewards of the environment in accordance with the principles of sustainable development”.[6] However, the Company has not conducted environmental justice assessments or audits regarding the scope and impact of any of their operations or disclosed such information. Conducting environmental justice audits would assist Newmont in mitigating adverse impacts on affected communities while reducing legal liabilities and brand damage.

[1] https://www.parnassus.com/updates/article/investment_case_for_environmental_justice

[2] https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2020/09/22/climate-change-environmental-justice/

[3] https://operations.newmont.com

[4] https://www.ghanaenvironment.com/calls-for-newmont-to-fix-deplorable-roads-deepens-as-traditional-leaders-raises-concerns/; https://earthworks.org/blog/peruvian-communities-challenge-newmont-mining-operations-as-investors-meet/; https://earthworks.org/blog/buyat_bay_and_ratatatok

[5] https://peer.org/gold-mine-expansion-ok-shows-broken-air-permit-process/

[6] https://s24.q4cdn.com/382246808/files/doc_downloads/2020/11/Sustainability-and-Stakeholder-Engagement-Policy.pdf

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.