PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION | Racial Justice Scorecard results & implicit harm to communities at PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
PPC
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Pilgrim’s Pride issue a public report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, disclosing its internal diversity and inclusion policies and practices.
Whereas clause
Equity-based policies and programs that promote diversity and inclusion strengthen workforce effectiveness and corporate performance. Numerous studies have demonstrated the financial benefits of a diverse, inclusive workplace, while others demonstrate the risk of failing to establish human capital management policies that support and retain a diverse workforce:

A McKinsey study found that companies with the strongest racial and ethnic diversity are 35% more likely to outperform their industry medians for earnings before interest and tax.[1]

According to CEO Action for Inclusion & Diversity, “organizations that lead with inclusion are eight times more likely to have better business outcomes.” [2]

According to a recent CNBC survey, 80% of workers prefer to work for a company that values DEI.[3]

A recent study by As You Sow of EEO-1 forms found a “positive association between diverse representation in management and positive financial performance.” [4]

Pilgrim’s Pride is lagging its peers on diversity and inclusion policies and practices. Pilgrim’s Pride earned a 3% score on As You Sow’s Racial Justice Scorecard, compared with Tyson Foods’ 11% and General Mill’s 12%.[5] The Company’s low score reflects minimal transparency on workforce data and its failure to disclose related human capital management policies and practices, as well as issues with workers’ rights and treatment.

Despite providing a general, public, diversity, equity, and inclusion statement, shareholders have a strong interest in gaining access to information about our Company’s internal diversity and inclusion policies and quantitative data demonstrating the effectiveness of those policies. Particularly important is the ability to understand whether they are sufficient to attract and retain the diverse talent critical to long-term success and avoid issues that create reputational harm or reduced financial performance.

As an example, in 2024, Pilgrim’s Pride faced serious reputational damage after reports of dangerous and abusive work conditions for undocumented workers facility.[6] These issues signal weak internal accountability on related issues. The Company can improve its performance and reduce material risk by increasing transparency around its diversity and inclusion policies and practices.[7]

[1] https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/delivering-through-diversity

[2] https://www.ceoaction.com/purpose/

[3] https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/30/diversity-equity-and-inclusion-are-important-to-workers-survey-shows.html

[4] Report — As You Sow

[5] Racial Justice Data Visualization — As You Sow

[6] https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/usa-migrant-workers-incl-undocumented-workers-face-abusive-working-conditions-at-pilgrims-prides-west-virginia-chicken-factory-incl-cos-comments/; https://mountainstatespotlight.org/2024/06/05/pilgrims-pride-moorefield-immigrant-workers/

[7]https://assets.ctfassets.net/zedzgminpdhk/39LsaE4mJDD1AKxpHFBPU1/1fa1580944d02c15586b69a274276f07/PPC_DiversityEquityInclusion_Global_Policies_2.pdf

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.