HCA Healthcare Corp. | RIGHT TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT at HCA Healthcare Corp.

Status
Filed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
HCA
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Shareholder rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Health Care
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the board of directors take the necessary steps to permit written consent by the shareholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize an action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting (without any discrimination or restriction based on length of stock ownership). This includes shareholder ability to initiate any appropriate topic for written consent.
Supporting statement
HCA Healthcare shareholders have a particular need for the right to act by written consent because it is considerably more difficult than necessary for HCA shareholders to call a special shareholder meeting. Delaware law considers it reasonable for 10% of shareholders to call a special meeting — yet HCA made the threshold 15% of shareholders and then discriminated against HCA shareholders who owned their stock for less than one continuous year by banishing them from this important shareholder right. Acting by written consent is hardly ever used by shareholders but the main point of having a right to act by written consent is that it gives shareholders greater standing to engage effectively with management when HCA is underperforming. There are challenging news reports regarding HCA that argue for a greater standing for HCA shareholders to engage with HCA. Healthcare Dive and Yahoo Finance reported in October 2025 that HCA was monitoring “looming headwinds,” including the potential expiration of Affordable Care Act subsidies at the end of the year. This could cause millions to become uninsured as premiums rise, impacting hospital revenue. News reports highlighted that HCA continues to face significant workforce challenges, including talent shortages and burnout. In its Q3 earnings call, HCA noted ongoing pressure from operating costs and labor expenses. The California’s Attorney General announced a settlement with HCA over its use of Training Repayment Agreement Provisions. HCA allegedly required new nurses to repay thousands of dollars for training if they left before 2-years. This practice was described as an “abusive training debt scheme” that trapped nurses in their jobs. A class-action lawsuit was also filed by the California Nurses Association over the practice. HCA’s Mission Hospital in Asheville, North Carolina, was once again placed in “immediate jeopardy” by federal regulators for serious safety violations. This was the third such designation since 2019 and followed patient misidentification, improper patient monitoring, and lapses in infection control. The hospital could lose government funding according to STAT News. An NBC News video cited HCA worker claims that HCA puts profits above patient care, citing understaffing, cost-cutting that impacted safety and pushing patients into hospice early to improve mortality statistics. Facebook posts claimed that HCA’s focus on profits over patient care led to unsafe nurse-to-patient ratios, inadequate orientation for new staff, and a poor work environment. Please vote yes: Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent — Proposal 5

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.