Royal Bank of Canada | Chair election

Status
Filed
AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
RY:CN
Submitted by
Resolution ask
Strengthen board oversight of issue
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Climate adaptation
  • Climate change
  • Fossil fuel financing
  • GHG targets / emissions
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Director vote
Filer type
Management
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
Canada
Supporting materials
Supporting statement
Re-election of Jacynthe Côté as Chair…………… AGAINST
By removing its Policy Guidelines for Sensitive Sectors and Activities from the public domain, RBC has traded transparency for uncertainty. In high-risk areas like Arctic oil & gas and thermal coal, it was previously clear which
kinds of clients and activities the bank was willing support. Now, RBC’s risk appetite is unclear. In the meantime, any step up in the financing of previously restricted activities could lead to significant risks for the bank,
communities, and the environment. The overall result of the bank’s decision is to make an already weak position on fossil fuels even weaker. RBC may wish to argue that the removal of its policies from the public domain is a
response to new greenwashing provisions in the Competition Act; however, a number of the bank’s Canadian peers show it is possible to maintain clear positions. It is the responsibility of RBC’s Chair, Jacynthe Côté, to ensure the board is exercising oversight of the bank’s approach to managing climate risks and capturing opportunities from the energy transition. In ShareAction’s view, the disappearance of the bank’s policies suggests this oversight function is not being exercised with sufficient effect. On this basis, we believe a vote against the re-election of Ms Côté is justified.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.