THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. | Lobbying Disclosure at THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.

Status
Filed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
7
Resolution details
Company ticker
GS
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (“Goldman” or “Goldman Sachs”) request the preparation of a report that is updated annually, omits proprietary data, and is produced at reasonable cost, which discloses: Payments made by Goldman Sachs that are used for direct or indirect lobbying; in each indirect case including the amount of the payment as well as the recipient. For purposes of this proposal, payments used for direct lobbying are the annual aggregate amounts reported at the federal and state levels, broken out by federal and individual state. Payments used for indirect lobbying are payments to trade associations or social welfare groups that are used for lobbying, as defined by tax law. Both direct and indirect lobbying include efforts at the state and federal levels. The report shall be posted on the Goldman Sachs website.
Supporting statement
As long-term shareholders of Goldman Sachs, we support transparency and accountability in corporate lobbying. Companies and investors may benefit if lobbying leads to improved policies, reduced regulation or taxation, or governmental contracts or subsidies. However, lobbying activities also create costs and can create risks for a corporation – and, by extension, their shareholders. Currently, to assemble any kind of picture of a company’s lobbying, shareholders must search both federal and 50 individual state lobbying databases. But a complete picture is not possible because state disclosure requirements vary widely;1 for instance, an analysis of one company’s disclosures revealed that 25 out of 48 states did not disclose amounts spent.2 In 2024, Goldman Sachs spent $2.74 million on federal lobbying alone – but this figure does not include state lobbying, where Goldman also lobbies. Goldman fails to even list its trade associations, much less the amounts it pays to those trade associations that are then used for lobbying. Similarly, it fails to disclose the amount of payments made to social welfare groups, that are then used for lobbying. The International Corporate Governance Network policy on lobbying recommends that a company commit to public disclosure of its lobbying activities as well as any direct or indirect expenditure beyond a de minimis level (e.g., a contribution equal to or less than $10,000). Many companies provide this kind of annual lobbying reporting to shareholders, including Cardinal Health, Exxon, Procter & Gamble, and Xcel Energy – each of which report on their federal and state lobbying, along with indirect lobbying through trade associations and social welfare groups; Amazon and Walmart – which provide full state lobbying reports; and American Express, Ameriprise Financial, and US Bancorp – which provide an annual report of trade association payments used for lobbying. Companies are required to report this information at the federal and state levels, so it is not burdensome to also report it to shareholders. THEREFORE: We urge Goldman Sachs to expand its lobbying disclosure. 1 www.ncsl.org/ethics/how-states-define-lobbying-and-lobbyist 2 www.citizen.org/news/despite-company-claims-eli-lilly-fails-to-disclose-its-state-lobbying-spending-for-half-the-country

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.