Lithia Motors Inc. | Separate Chair & CEO at Lithia Motors Inc.

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • CEO / chair duality
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED : Shareholders request that the Board of Directors adopt an enduring policy, and amend the governing documents as necessary in order that 2 separate people hold the office of the Chairman and the office of the CEO as soon as possible.
Supporting statement
The Chairman of the Board shall be an Independent Director. A Lead Director shall not be a substitute for an independent Board Chairman. The Board shall have the discretion to select an interim Chairman of the Board, who is not an Independent Director, to serve while the Board is required to seek an Independent Chairman of the Board on an accelerated basis. This policy could be phased in when there is a contract renewal for our current CEO or for the next CEO transition although it is better to adopt it now. An independent Board Chairman at all times improves corporate governance by bringing impartiality, objective oversight, and external expertise to board decisions, mitigating conflicts of interest, enhancing transparency, and boosting shareholder confidence. This detached perspective allows the chairman to focus on shareholder interests , strengthen management accountability, and provide critical checks and balances, ultimately contributing to long-term sustainability and credibility. Now could be a ripe time for a change since Lithia Motors stock was at $418 in 2021 and at only $310 late in 2025 despite a robust stock market. A wrongful death lawsuit was filed against a Texas Lithia dealership following a fatal car crash during a customer's test drive. The salesperson who accompanied the customer on the test drive was allegedly drunk, testing positive for alcohol and possibly cocaine after the crash. The customer was reportedly driving the Dodge Challenger at 120 mph when the Challenger struck another car, killing a woman. Financial analysts revised their revenue and earnings per share estimates for Lithia downwards for 2025. Analysts have noted a trend of contracting gross profit per vehicle (GPU). New vehicle GPUs declined sequentially in Q3 2025. An October 23, 2025 article said that despite top-line growth, Lithia faces "ongoing pressure from slim and slipping profit margins, elevated costs, and a stretched balance sheet." Selling, General, and Administrative costs increased as a percentage of gross profit in Q3. An October 2025 Yelp review described a frustrating service experience at a Lithia dealership, including damage to a car and issues with repairs. This is consistent with earlier complaints about management and customer service at Lithia dealerships. Consumer reviews and discussions on social media reflect growing dissatisfaction with Lithia-owned dealerships. A Reddit user reported a decline in service quality and a "nightmare delay" for a warranty repair after Lithia bought their local Subaru dealership. An October 2025 Facebook post accused a Lithia dealership in New Mexico of using misleading promotional offers and running a credit check 15-times against the customer's wishes.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.