Power Integrations, Inc. | Separate Chair & CEO at Power Integrations, Inc.

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • CEO / chair duality
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED : Shareholders request that the Board of Directors adopt an enduring policy, and amend the governing documents as necessary in order that 2 separate people hold the office of the Chairman and the office of the CEO as soon as possible.  
Supporting statement
The Chairman of the Board shall be an Independent Director. A Lead Director shall not be a substitute for an independent Board Chairman. The Board shall have the discretion to select an interim Chairman of the Board, who is not an Independent Director, to serve while the Board is required to seek an Independent Chairman of the Board on an accelerated basis. This policy could be phased in when there is a contract renewal for our current CEO or for the next CEO transition although it is better to adopt it now. An independent Board Chairman at all times improves corporate governance by bringing impartiality, objective oversight, and external expertise to board decisions, mitigating conflicts of interest, enhancing transparency, and boosting shareholder confidence. This detached perspective allows the chairman to focus on shareholder interests , strengthen management accountability, and provide critical checks and balances, ultimately contributing to long-term sustainability and credibility. Now could be a ripe time for a change since Power Integrations stock was at $110 in 2021 and at only $34 late in 2025 despite a robust stock market. This proposal received 45% support at the 2025 Power Integrations annual meeting without any special effort by the proponent. While some investors are giving a new CEO, Jennifer Lloyd, the benefit of the doubt, her ability to deliver on ambitious growth targets remains unproven. Analysts warned that POWI stock may be punished if she fails to show significant progress. Investment analysts have expressed concern that POWI stock appears overvalued based on traditional metrics. Reports in October 2025 said that a high P/E ratio suggests the market is pricing in substantial growth that POWI has failed to deliver. Analysts noted that POWI stock multiples are more aligned with high growth, yet POWI faces near-term earnings challenges and a projected slow-growth outlook. This has led some to call the stock "arguably overvalued." Following a mixed Q1 2025 report in May, POWI stock dropped after POWI announced weak results, increased inventory, and revenue guidance that was only "in-line" with expectations. A subsequent, disappointing Q2 2025 report was also noted by analysts, who commented on weakening demand. POWI?s long-term performance has also been weak, with earnings and revenue shrinking over the past 5-years. Multiple reports in September and October 2025 highlighted signs of weakening demand, particularly in the consumer market, suggesting POWI could be heading into another downturn. POWI is also seen as sensitive to the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry. An October 2025 report pointed out that POWI generates a majority of its revenue from China (58% in Q2 2025), making it vulnerable to U.S.-China geopolitical tensions and tariffs.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.