CHEVRON CORPORATION | Assess Effectiveness of Policies in Respecting Indigenous Peoples? Rights at CHEVRON CORPORATION

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
CVX
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Local communities and/or indigenous rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Energy
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED : Shareholders request that Chevron Corporation (Chevron?) publish a report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary and confidential information, evaluating the effectiveness of Chevrons policies, practices, and performance indicators in respecting Indigenous Peoples rights, in accordance with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and the right to Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC). At the Boards discretion, the report could assess how these policies and practices are implemented both in current operations and in addressing past harms, including processes for remediating adverse impacts.
Whereas clause
The UNDRIP establishes internationally recognized rights for Indigenous Peoples, including FPIC, for activities affecting their lands. 1 Chevron operates in over 180 countries, and is one of the world?s largest greenhouse gas-emitting companies. 2 Its operations frequently intersect with Indigenous Peoples? lands. Despite Chevron?s stated support for UNDRIP and commitments to engage Indigenous communities respectfully, 3 its operations have been linked to severe rights violations, raising questions about the effectiveness of these commitments. These violations pose material risks, including reputational damage, costly project delays, and potential legal liability. 4 Chevron?s Texaco acquisition brought with it the legacy of operations, which caused longstanding adverse impacts on Indigenous communities, including the Waorani, Siekopai, Siona, A?I Kofan, Shuar, and Kichwa, and nearly 80 campesino communities. 5 Operations left over 1,000 toxic waste pits, and soil and water pollution up to 200 times US safety standards. 6 Independent studies document elevated cancer and other serious illnesses, 7 displacement, loss of livelihoods, and cultural harm. 8 Despite a $9.5 billion Ecuadorian court judgment, Chevron has not provided restitution. 9 Chevron?s refineries have sustained Amazon crude drilling, sourcing oil from Indigenous territories in Ecuador despite court protections, with one plant having processed nearly 25% of US Amazon crude. 10 In 2025, following protests by Waorani, Kichwa, and A?i Kofan leaders at a Chevron refinery, the California Senate passed Resolution 51, calling for an investigation into Amazon crude imports and urging a phase-out, demonstrating how Indigenous resistance influences policy and creates risks to Chevron?s supply chain. 11 In 2025, Ecuador unveiled a $47 billion ?hydrocarbon roadmap? to auction 49 new oil and gas blocks, 18 of which overlap Indigenous territories, heightening the risk of rights violations, legal challenges, and community opposition. 12 Failure to respect Indigenous Peoples? rights exposes Chevron to material risks. Projects without FPIC often face protests, litigation, and delays. 13 Negative media and NGO campaigns threaten the company?s social license, 14 while conflicts jeopardize project viability and supply chains. 15 Investor expectations increasingly demand robust Indigenous rights policies, risking exclusion from socially responsible investors. 16 Cases show Indigenous opposition can trigger multi-year litigation and regulatory intervention, creating long-term financial volatility. 17 A report evaluating the effectiveness of Chevron?s policies, processes, and performance indicators is critical for understanding whether Chevron?s stated commitments are effective at managing material risks. 1 https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.html https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312314 2 https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/09/revealed-20-firms-third-carbon-emissions 3 https://www.chevron.com/-/media/chevron/sustainability/documents/respecting-human-rights-pdf-download.pdf 4 https://www.colorado.edu/program/fpw/sites/default/files/attached-files/social_cost_and_material_loss_0.pdf ; https://amazonwatch.org/news/2022/0622-the-business-case-for-indigenous-rights 5 https://www.foei.org/es/grupos-miembro/ecuador/; https://udapt.org/conocenos/ 6 https://chevronsglobaldestruction.com/chevrons_global_destruction_report.pdf ; https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/28741/steven-donziger-chevron-oil-amazon-contamination-injustice/#:~:text=In%2 01993%2C%20in%20a%20New,by%20US%20and%20world%20standards. 7 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11452046/ ; https://chevroninecuador.org/assets/docs/cancer-summary.pdf ; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/oeh.2004.10.3.245 ; https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/article/2024/may/16/breathing-contaminated-ecuador-schoolgirls-fight-fossil-ga s-flaring 8 https://ejatlas.org/print/chevron-texaco-ecuador 9 https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/15/world/americas/15ecuador.html 10 https://amazonwatch.org/assets/files/2021-12-linked-fates.pdf 11 https://apnews.com/article/amazon-oil-ecuador-california-rainforest-indigenous-resolution-imports-oil-288d7925cd1000a825c82c73d6fb45a0 12 https://amazonwatch.org/news/2025/0924-indigenous-groups-criticize-ecuadors-47-billion-oil-expansion-plan-in-amazon 13 https://www.colorado.edu/program/fpw/sites/default/files/attached-files/indigenous_rights_risk_report.pdf 14 https://laisar.com/your-companys-social-license-dont-wait-for-crisis-to-strike/ ; https://amazonwatch.org/news/2024/0523-in-2024-anti-chevron-day-has-become-anti-chevron-month 15 https://amazonwatch.org/news/2022/0622-the-business-case-for-indigenous-rights 16 https://sustainableinvestor.online/indigenous-rights-a-guide-forinvestors/#:~:text=Fortunately%2C%20investors%20are%20finally%20beginning,last%20year%20received%20comparable%20support. 17 https://amazonwatch.org/news/2022/0622-the-business-case-for-indigenous-rights

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.