ELI LILLY AND COMPANY | Lobbying Expenditures Disclosure at ELI LILLY AND COMPANY

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
LLY
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Health Care
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Resolved,  shareholders of Eli Lilly (Lilly) request the preparation of a report, updated annually, omitting any proprietary data and produced at reasonable cost, disclosing: Payments by Lilly used for direct or indirect lobbying, in each indirect case including the amount of the payment and the recipient.  For purposes of this proposal, payments used for direct lobbying are the annual aggregate amounts reported at the federal and state levels, broken out by federal and individual state. Payments used for indirect lobbying are payments to trade associations or social welfare groups that are used for lobbying as defined by tax law. Both direct and indirect lobbying include efforts at the state and federal levels.  The report shall be posted on Lillys website
Supporting statement
As long-term shareholders of Lilly, we support transparency and accountability in corporate lobbying. Companies and investors may benefit if lobbying leads to improved policies, reduced regulation or taxation, or government contracts or subsidies. However, lobbying activities also create costs and can create risks for a corporation ? and by extension, shareholders. Currently, shareholders must search the federal and 50 state lobbying databases to assemble a picture of a company?s lobbying. And state disclosure requirements vary widely, [1] with an analysis of Lilly?s disclosures finding 25 out of 48 states did not disclose amounts spent. [2] Lilly spent $8,430,000 on federal lobbying for 2024. This does not include state lobbying, where Lilly also lobbies. Lilly lists support of ten trade associations yet fails to disclose the amounts of its payments to those groups used for lobbying. And Lilly?s disclosure leaves out its memberships in and payments to social welfare groups, like the Alliance for Competitive Taxation and the Alliance for Patient Access. The International Corporate Governance Network policy on lobbying recommends a company commit to public disclosure of its lobbying activities and any direct or indirect expenditure beyond a de minimis level (e.g., a contribution equal to or less than $10,000). Many companies already provide annual lobbying reports to shareholders, including Cardinal Health, Exxon, Procter & Gamble and Xcel Energy, which report on their federal and state lobbying and indirect lobbying through trade associations and social welfare groups, and Amazon and Walmart, which provide full state lobbying reports. Among our company?s peers, Biogen, Gilead Sciences, Merck and Pfizer each provide an annual report of their trade association payments used for lobbying to shareholders. Companies are required to report this information at the federal and state levels, so it is not overly burdensome to provide it to shareholders. We urge Lilly to expand its lobbying disclosure. [1] https://www.ncsl.org/ethics/how-states-define-lobbying-and-lobbyist . [2] https://www.citizen.org/news/despite-company-claims-eli-lilly-fails-to-disclose-its-state-lobbying-spending-for-half-the-country/ .

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.