Meta (FACEBOOK, INC.) | Incorporate Child Safety in Senior Executive Compensation Program at Meta (FACEBOOK, INC.)

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
FB
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Digital rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Technology
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request the Boards Compensation Committee publish a report (at reasonable expense, within a reasonable time, and omitting confidential or propriety information) assessing the feasibility of integrating performance on improving child safety into Metas senior executive compensation program, which it describes in its annual proxy materials.
Whereas clause
Incentives align the interests of executives with the overall performance of the company by linking executive compensation to achieving specific metrics. In additional to financial targets, performance-based incentives can also be linked to nonfinancial goals including worker safety, customer satisfaction, and employee engagement ? which can also have financial impacts. Meta?s Proxy Statement says the compensation program for its named executives is designed to "align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders in the overall success of our company by emphasizing long-term incentives"i and to support key objectives, including to ?encourage our executives to focus on our company priorities;?ii Meta?s website states that ?child protection is always a top priority.? Although shareholder proposals on child safety have been supported by up to 60 percent of the independent vote,iii Meta has not explicitly linked child protection goals with executive compensation. Investors seek clarity on how Meta's executives are incentivized to reduce financial and reputational risk related to child protection. Regulatory action at state, federal and international levels target online child safety risks and can cost billions in fines and/or lost users. Meta?s response to online child safety has resulted in financial, legal, regulatory, and reputational risk. Meta has been criticized by law enforcement, governments, child safety experts, and child victims and their families for failing to meet the scope and urgency of addressing online child sexual exploitation on Meta?s platforms.iv Over 1800 lawsuits from children, parents, school districts, and 42 state attorneys generalv claim that Meta knew it exacerbated mental health concerns and that minors were continually being contacted by adult strangers. vi The European Union (EU) warned Meta that its ?voluntary code on child protection seems not to work? and to take immediate action.vii It later warned Meta about blocking researchers from studying its children related content. The EU?s Digital Services Act can impose fines of 6 percent of a company?s global revenue for violations. viii Australia banned social media for kids under 16 requiring Meta to remove users; fines for violations can total millions of dollars. Nine countries and 12 states have passed or are considering youth social media restrictions.ix x Studies show that including nonfinancial performance measures in executive compensation programs increases a firm's long-term value.xi Including performance on child safety in the executive compensation programs of senior Meta executives would have material, positive impacts on the long-term value of the company.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.